^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
First of all, what's wrong with that?
But anyway, when someone makes an assertion, such as "Q has named RR to be a black hat," then I am simply asking: "Okay--When did Q say that? Which drop?"
My contention is that Q has maintained ambivalence on this point, as has POTUS.
If I am wrong, then please show me.
I love these ‘Can’t prove a negative’ types.
Done every day with computer programs, for starters.
I’d like to set up a booth, fill it with CO2, put a sign over it that says, ‘There’s no oxygen in this booth, and I can prove it.’
:: I am simply asking: “Okay—When did Q say that? Which drop?” ::
I will reply with a wonderful court maneuver that anyone contemplating legal deposition or interrogation should keep in their pocket; especially when the interrogator badgers or attempts to attack from a different angle:
Ask and answered. (But with help.)
how does “Q” identify a “black-hat”. He doesn’t use that term.