Replies

You’re hallucinating.
__________________________

Nope. One doesn’t have to be hallucinating to disagree with you.
__________________________

I’ll point it out again, Q was arguing with Anons that were saying nothing is happening at DOJ, that a second SC should be appointed. Q was saying those are wrong conclusions and bad ideas, and indeed they are. It had nothing to do with whether Sessions himself is doing an amazingly great job, he’s not. Others are doing a great job, all directed by POTUS who is frustrated that more can’t be done.

The Anons do have an argument in that none of the bad actors have yet been arrested or prosecuted in relation to the magnitude of their crimes, such as Imran Awan, Andrew McCabe, Joseph Mifsud, Bruce Ohr, so many others including many of the middle rank ‘resistance’ at DOJ and FBI.

_______________________________

The Anons complain and then Q chides them for their impatience and points out strategy.

_______________________________

It seems you’re caught up in some sort of ‘lore’ of Sessions that has taken a life of its own.
_______________________________

I support the Q team and their objectives (POTUS). Q cites Turely with approval, as Turley argues that Sessions using Huber and Horowitz is by far a superior strategy (#1286).
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

_______________________________

Sessions is just a nice old geezer Alabaman, a nice Christian man who supported Trump early on and was asked what he would like to do in the new administration and he answered he’d like to do what he did at the state level which was to be the Attorney General. And Trump, as kind as he is, gave Jeff the chance, and Jeff is at best half of what he needs to be in that position.
________________________________

Trump would have to be incompetent to have filled the AG position that way. Knowing how close we were to complete collapse of our freedom, and that of the world, at the mercy of sociopathic Satanists, neither he nor the Q team could risk so much on a chummy decision to let Sessions chose his own role. The painstaking care in assembling the strategies now underway did not allow for personal preference when staffing.
________________________________

But NSA has the goods on all of the bad Deep State Actors but the evidence is not admissible but with a great prosecutor, a way can be found to make it admissible. For example, interrogating two bad actors in two separate rooms and telling that the other snitched on them, then using NSA intercepts without the interrogee knowing NSA intercepts are being used to say what the other snitched about, this confuses the interrogee and makes them think the other bad actor really is snitching, but will Sessions order that to be done? No.

___________________________________________

We don’t know what methods they are employing, but whatever it is, it has the DEEP STATE in utter panic. Q did indicate in earlier drops that a person taken to GITMO for questioning is intimidated and causes the other bad actors to worry that they are snitching. But why waste time suggesting armchair talk is better than the Trump/Q TEAM plan to save the republic with all the expertise in play? They have so much more expertise, time spent in planning, and resources (intel) than we do.
____________________________________________

If it was left totally to Sessions, these investigations and prosecutions could be finished by 2030.

_____________________________

I don’t believe the Q team and Trump roll that way - they’d never take Sessions on if that were the case. They know our lives depend on such decisions.
______________________________________

That’s why POTUS and his WH lawyers who are truly top-shelf got Sessions to get Huber onboard and teamed with the IG.

______________________________________

That was the plan from the start. They are facing historic levels of prosecution and they planned to use Huber and Horowitz and all their extensive resources to handle the load. There’s that Turley link again:
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

______________________________________

You’ve got some sort of weird Sessions fixation. I advise you to get rid of it.
____________________________________

No, of course I don’t. I just follow Q content closely.
____________________________________

Your statements regarding #2071:

“Don’t Fall for the Click-bait Headlines Regarding Sessions”
“Jeff Sessions Directing Housecleaning at FBI & DOJ.”

Neither of these statements of yours appear in #2071. You are reading them into that Q post but they are not there. That’s a fact.
_____________________________________

I stated that the Anons labeled the Q drops and Q supervises the Anons and would counter false info. Those titles are from Qmap.pub meant to help normies navigate. And, matches the context perfectly.
_____________________________________

The only sources in #2071 that LOVES/TRUSTS SESSIONS are Dems and Leftists. POTUS no longer trusts Sessions which is why the Dems suddenly love the guy. So POTUS can’t fire Sessions because Dems will scream obstruction because now they ‘trust’ him. This is what is called in the military a clusterf*ck.
______________________________________
In #2071 Q mocks those who criticize the strategy re Sessions and Huber and picks apart/exposes their faulty logic. Trump and Q team are masterful with optics and they are utilizing optics to garner support for Sessions actions down the line. Polarizing Trump and Sessions the way they have in the public eye, when Sessions does act, he will do so after months of praise from the left, making it hard to say he was Trump’s. Oh they’ll still say it, but the public will have valid reason to believe otherwise.

Drops like 2006 and 2029 provide the context I’ve described, and the Anons have added titles (qmap.pub) to help those who don’t have time for the context or who are just jumping on now.
No I’m not hallucinating, obsessing, reading into things etc. I’m researching Q content, learning from FReeQ finds and analysis re the best analysts in the Q community, and using logic - and I disagree with you.