“I note you havent answered my question, nor attempted an explanation.”
I already explained it but you either can’t grasp it or you’re playing dumb.
How about this: Batman may be anonymous, but Bruce Wayne is famous. Can you understand that?
So while “Q” is anonymous, the person or persons actually making the posts can still have a public persona and thereby profit by the posts that they are creating, by running a website, or a youtube channel, etc, based on those posts. I can’t explain it in any simpler terms than that, so if you still don’t get it, I’m not going to bother trying to help you figure it out anymore.
the person or persons actually making the posts can still have a public persona and thereby profit by the posts that they are creating, by running a website,
I understand that argument, now please identify them. I will ask how you know...
the person or persons actually making the posts can still have a public persona and thereby profit by the posts that they are creating, by running a website,
PS - Bruce isnt famous for what Batman does...
Deep thinker.
#GeniusLevel