[Swordmaker]

Thank you, I did see the comments regarding the new site and how some believed it should be approached carefully as it looked suspect.
So the Twitter Q linked is showing a man who declares he is NOT part of that new site and that they had falsely attached his name to it? So the Twitter guy is a good guy, for pointing out the abuse?

Q is pointing out that no matter how good a site may look at first blush, it may not be trustworthy. These two are using fake endorsements to give them more gravitas than they deserve, so don't trust them. Among the truths they may post will be lies and misrepresentations.

As Judge Judy says, "Lie to me once, and everything else you say is not believable."

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Thank you. And I’d be remiss not to add my own thank you for your lexicon and all the work you’ve poured into it.

I wish there were a simple list of the less familiar black hats, sometimes I can’t seem to recall whose good vs whose a skunk.