Skip to comments.
The US Geological Survey Is Getting Serious About Space Resources and Mining
space.com ^
| September 4, 2018 07:00am ET
| Leonard David
Posted on 09/04/2018 6:56:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
09/04/2018 6:56:54 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Great! Maybe they can put together a prospectus and attract some private investors. Good luck, guys!
2
posted on
09/04/2018 7:08:46 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
("Nature, Mr. Allnut, is what we are put in this world to rise above.")
To: BenLurkin
I know it wouldn’t be a lot at first, but over time, the extra tonnage that didn’t develop on the planet will add up.
3
posted on
09/04/2018 7:10:16 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: BenLurkin
Hell no!! Those doped up parasites living off of working people can’t be beat. That is why only people that pay income taxes should VOTE!!
4
posted on
09/04/2018 7:11:05 PM PDT
by
raiderboy
(Trump promised “shut down the government” in September; if no wall!!)
To: BenLurkin
5
posted on
09/04/2018 7:28:34 PM PDT
by
The Duke
(President Trump = America's Last, Best Chanceh)
To: BenLurkin
But now it's also investigating what benefits may or may not exist in tapping extraterrestrial water, minerals and metals. This is just a ruse. They really want to start regulating outer space. The bureaucrats hate freedom.
6
posted on
09/04/2018 7:31:47 PM PDT
by
bkopto
To: BenLurkin

This is kind of fitting. We don't think about it much now, but in between the Louisiana purchase and the 1890s there were decades where not much was really known about what was inside the continent. It was just too difficult for most people to get into the west, let alone get back to the settled east coast and let people know what was there.
In this period there were photographic expeditions by the USGS, mapping the interior, especially for railroad routes, and for natural resources. The first photographs taken of the Rocky Mountains were taken by the USGS.
To: BenLurkin
We need good Tractor Beam technology in order to bring all of that Space stuff here without risking the lives our Astronauts. .
8
posted on
09/04/2018 7:47:26 PM PDT
by
Radix
(Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents)
To: BenLurkin
My dad talked about mining gold from asteroids thirty years ago. He was a terrible father but he was also a genius. He said the problem with mining said gold was radiation. Of note he was also an engineer and worked at San Onofre nuclear plant.
9
posted on
09/04/2018 8:08:49 PM PDT
by
enduserindy
(IÂ’m done explaining basic math and the definition of freedom.)
To: Radix
The “Space stuff” is more valuable in space than it is here.
10
posted on
09/04/2018 8:09:33 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: Radix
Yes, but how will you redistribute the mass so keep an even keel?
11
posted on
09/04/2018 8:12:24 PM PDT
by
Cvengr
( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
To: enduserindy
I wrote a paper on the potential of mining the apollo and amor asteroids 35 years ago.
12
posted on
09/04/2018 8:13:20 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: marktwain
Whats your thought on radiation levels in gold from space? My dad said in the eighties recycled gold from electronics had the potential to be radioactive. He said gold on asteroids would be exposed to high levels and that gold could retain it for a very long time.
13
posted on
09/04/2018 8:40:52 PM PDT
by
enduserindy
(IÂ’m done explaining basic math and the definition of freedom.)
To: enduserindy
14
posted on
09/04/2018 9:18:55 PM PDT
by
mindburglar
(I like spelling it Lazers. It looks cooler.)
To: mindburglar
That’s why Goldfinger’s plan was stupid.
15
posted on
09/04/2018 9:19:30 PM PDT
by
mindburglar
(I like spelling it Lazers. It looks cooler.)
To: mindburglar
Well I think this would be a good investment in light of that.
16
posted on
09/04/2018 9:44:20 PM PDT
by
enduserindy
(IÂ’m done explaining basic math and the definition of freedom.)
To: wastedyears
I know it wouldnt be a lot at first, but over time, the extra tonnage that didnt develop on the planet will add up. I once saw a scientific calculation of the amount of dust that falls onto planet earth from outer space each day. The tonnage was staggering.
The amount of minerals we bring back from space will never come close to that.
17
posted on
09/04/2018 11:35:29 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: BenLurkin
To: Windflier
There’s dust that doesn’t burn upon hitting our atmosphere? Is that diamond dust or something?
19
posted on
09/05/2018 2:22:59 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: wastedyears
Theres dust that doesnt burn upon hitting our atmosphere? Is that diamond dust or something? Dust motes from space don't fall to earth with near enough velocity to burn up in our atmosphere. They're almost weightless, individually.
20
posted on
09/05/2018 2:33:55 AM PDT
by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson