Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/03/2018 11:09:34 AM PDT by Silentgypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Silentgypsy
a split-second calculation that his computers could never have made

I want a human at the controls, just in case.

2 posted on 09/03/2018 11:12:48 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

The only I’m certain about artificial intelligence is, in the end, whomever owns the AI, will not be giving away the benefits for free. Even if everybody is out of work because of AI.

My sense is that, if you can’t keep up, you will be provided for but you might have to exchange being sterilized for those benefits to ensure that you don’t children who are not capable of keeping up. Only the most intelligent will be permitted to have children.


3 posted on 09/03/2018 11:23:32 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy
... the pilots cited cases where, they argued, the action of pilots had saved an airplane and its passengers when the computers could not have.

In at least two of those cases they had a point.

In January 2009 Captain “Sully” Sullenberger saved the lives of 150 passengers by making an emergency landing on the Hudson River.

No, they don't have a point with this case, for two reasons.

First, computers could easily be trained to do this. Sully taught pilots in simulators for years after the incident. Computer systems can learn from that data.

Secondly, Sully could land the plane because he had very precise extra skills as a glider pilot, which commercial pilots aren't trained for. In other words, out of all the pilots in the world, he was one of a handful, or even the only one, who could land that plane safely. Every other pilot would have ended up killing someone. If a computer is trained in this landing, then any aircraft that is running with that software can survive.

And this doesn't even go into the fact that most aircraft fatalities are due to pilot error. If machines can eliminate those, there will be far fewer fatalities, even counting the extreme cases that the software can't handle.

4 posted on 09/03/2018 11:27:21 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

Robots have been around for 40 years. And I still see shortage of skilled people and corporations can’t find enough qualified workers. My nephew just graduated with an engineering degree and has MULTIPLE job offers to choose from. I guess the robots are not smart enough to replace him.


9 posted on 09/03/2018 11:42:38 AM PDT by entropy12 (Trump/Pence 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

Called robot day.


12 posted on 09/03/2018 11:52:41 AM PDT by mulligan (EeThe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy
The article is not really about flying, although it uses cockpit automation to make its point. The author intends for us to consider an inevitable world where automation is superior to human labor in every way: "We are not very good at keeping up high levels of concentration and maximum alertness in all situations. That is why we created machines that are far better at it than we are. It took too long for us to admit this. Give the robots the kind of self-respect and dignity that we demand in our new infinite leisure."

"Infinite leisure", what is meant by that? I believe that the author foresees a world where robotics and computer automation replaces every need for human labor. If so, we would inherit the blessing of infinite leisure. Maybe. But consider for what purpose beyond our basic needs would that automation be used? This would depend on human imagination which cannot not be replicated by any algorithm. John Quincy Adams once wrote "I am a warrior so that my son can be a merchant, so that his son may be a poet". Once we are secure, and all our our material needs have been fulfilled and more, we will still need to inspire and entertain ourselves, lest we die of boredom.

14 posted on 09/03/2018 12:00:57 PM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

Then we can have Robot Day instead.

Labor Day sounds a little too progressive, in my opinion.

Then there’ll be jobs for people to design, build and maintain ...robots.

Win/Win


15 posted on 09/03/2018 12:03:57 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

In the year 2525.......


30 posted on 09/03/2018 12:25:57 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

An argument as old as the Luddites. New technologies have always resulted in more and varied jobs, not less. I don’t know what they will be, but they WILL be.


31 posted on 09/03/2018 12:36:36 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

just isn’t going to happen this way.


33 posted on 09/03/2018 12:57:08 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

When humans are fully replaced by robots, maybe our robot lords will let us have that day off from maintenance on robots.


43 posted on 09/03/2018 1:51:38 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy
Labor Day 2040: What Happens When Robots Do All the Work?

On Labor Day, I'd hope they'd have been trained to grill awesome brats and ribs!

-PJ

46 posted on 09/03/2018 2:14:10 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Silentgypsy

Just like some of the ‘safety” features in cars....a car can’t detect loose gravel, spots of ice and other road inconsistencies that can be seen by a driver...it’s possible for a car safety system to throw one off a cliff when the driver could have prevented it.


62 posted on 09/04/2018 2:52:31 AM PDT by trebb (So many "experts" with so little experience in what they preach....even here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson