Ol’ Dan Tucker,
You are ignoring the evidence and avoiding the question.
Your examples are “straw men” that have nothing to do with the argument and the evidence presented.
Stick to the reproducible, verifiable, empirical evidence.
Either a purely mechanical, balanced, spinning gyroscope mounted in a restraint free 3 axis gimbal on the surface of the earth exhibits “rigidity in space” or it does not.
No corrections. No electronics. No algorithms. No tricks.
This is a YES or NO question.
Which is it?
YES or NO?
What argument are you putting forth by your gyro example?