Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whitehouse Congress Petition Protect Free Speech in the Digital Public Square
Whitehouse.gov ^ | 8/28/2018 | W.C.

Posted on 08/28/2018 2:06:58 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/protect-free-speech-digital-public-square-0

WE THE PEOPLE ASK THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO CALL ON CONGRESS TO ACT ON AN ISSUE: Protect Free Speech in the Digital Public Square

Created by W.C. on August 28, 2018

4,984 SIGNED 100,000 GOAL

The internet is the modern public square. It is where political campaigns are fought and won, where journalism is created and distributed, and where grassroots movements are born. Yet, the free and open internet has become a controlled, censored space, monopolized by a few unaccountable corporations.

By banning users from their platforms, those corporations can effectively remove politically unwelcome Americans from the public square. That is repugnant to our shared values of free speech and freedom of the press.

The President should request that Congress pass legislation prohibiting social media platforms from banning users for First Amendment-protected speech. The power to block lawful content should be in the hands of individual users – not Mark Zuckerberg or Jack Dorsey.

CIVIL RIGHTS & EQUALITYTECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION Facebook Email Twitter

THE WHITE HOUSE MAY SEND ME EMAILS ABOUT THIS AND OTHER ISSUES. BY SIGNING THIS PETITION YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF PARTICIPATION AND PRIVACY POLICY. How Petitions Work Create a Petition Call on the White House to take action on the issue that matters to you.

Gather Signatures Share your petition with others, build a community for the change you want to make.

100,000 Signatures in 30 Days Get an official update from the White House within 60 days.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 1a; censorship; firstamendment; internetsocialism; petition; socialism; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
Fellow FReepers, This petition just went up on Whitehouse.gov. It only has 5K signatures out of min 100K needed. We MUST make this petition hit Way more than the Anti-Trump petitions that have 300K signatures. The First Ammendment is ours to lose.
1 posted on 08/28/2018 2:06:58 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
I went to the site and I think I signed it. I entered my name and email address and clicked the button that said "sign now."

Is that it?

2 posted on 08/28/2018 2:12:27 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

CNBC:

Trump: Facebook, Twitter, Google are ‘treading on very, very troubled territory and they have to be careful’

Trump said in a tweet that Google’s search engine had “rigged” news story search results to show mostly “bad” stories about him and other conservatives.

He later criticized Facebook and Twitter.
He says Google is prioritizing left-leaning outlets and warns that the situation “will be addressed.”

The president’s comments come a week before Google, Facebook and Twitter testify before Congress.

Larry Kudlow, Trump’s economic advisor, says the White House is “looking into” whether Google suppresses positive articles about the president.

Ryan Brown
Published 9 Hours Ago Updated 1 Hour Ago
CNBC.com


3 posted on 08/28/2018 2:12:49 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

The last few petitions I’ve signed all have an identical problem. It sends an email back to me for confirmation, but the confirming link doesn’t work. Same is happening here.

Now what?


4 posted on 08/28/2018 2:12:59 PM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Very good.
You were then instructed to check your email to send verification in order to validate e-signature.


5 posted on 08/28/2018 2:14:04 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

This petition would destroy Free Republic


6 posted on 08/28/2018 2:14:54 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12) Muller..... conspiracy to over throw the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Gotta save the country first.
We’ll worry about repairing FR afterwards.


7 posted on 08/28/2018 2:16:31 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

BFL


8 posted on 08/28/2018 2:17:27 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
I didn't see that. Perhaps I need to deactivate my "no script."

I just deactivated it, so i'll try again.

Yup. That worked. Got a confirmation in my email that time.

9 posted on 08/28/2018 2:22:57 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Governments censor.

Private sector companies do not.


10 posted on 08/28/2018 2:26:00 PM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bert
This petition would destroy Free Republic

It should be limited to platforms larger than a certain size. The target is megacorps like Goolag, Fascist book, and twitfest.

Smaller outlets do not pose a threat to public free speech.

11 posted on 08/28/2018 2:26:27 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

you receive an email that includes an http address to click on - that confirms your signature


12 posted on 08/28/2018 2:27:16 PM PDT by chuckr (Barack Hussein Obama - A Legend In His Own Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

signed :-)


13 posted on 08/28/2018 2:27:46 PM PDT by chuckr (Barack Hussein Obama - A Legend In His Own Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
The President should request that Congress pass legislation prohibiting social media platforms from banning users for First Amendment-protected speech.

Should they then pass legislation prohibiting me from banning people from my home for First Amendment-protected speech? Eff all that.

14 posted on 08/28/2018 2:28:02 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Governments censor.

Private sector companies do not.

If we allow private companies to censor, you will not be able to tell when there is a government behind it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3680451/posts

15 posted on 08/28/2018 2:28:12 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chuckr
Yes, I got that after I had disabled "no script" and went through the process again.
16 posted on 08/28/2018 2:28:53 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
And how did Warner do it? By "threatening new regulation of social media companies" exactly as you advocate.
17 posted on 08/28/2018 2:30:20 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
Should they then pass legislation prohibiting me from banning people from my home for First Amendment-protected speech?

If your home controls 90% of all public traffic of a certain class, then I would be in favor of seizing your home through the process of Eminent domain.

The power to control communications is too great a danger for the nation to survive.

Don't want your home seized? Don't make it a part of a critical national infrastructure.

18 posted on 08/28/2018 2:32:05 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
And how did Warner do it? By "threatening new regulation of social media companies" exactly as you advocate.

Requiring them to *NOT CENSOR* is not a regulation.

It is a prohibition for them to regulate.

19 posted on 08/28/2018 2:38:08 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Done


20 posted on 08/28/2018 2:38:54 PM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson