Replies

I’m with you. My thought is that there are 30 public figures Q team have decided to let commit suicide, if they want. 2 have opted for suicide (Barbara Bush, NoName?) which leaves 28.

My dilemma is: Theses are not suicides resulting from depression or mental illness. These are suicides made rationally as a way to avoid exposure and public humiliation. I would think this type of suicide is sinful.

Why is Q giving them this out...and, in a sense, encouraging them to sin?

I suppose not all consider it sinful and those who do will abstain? Some are no doubt atheists, Satanists, Christians who don’t believe it’s sin, those who do believe it’s sin, and other faiths/beliefs etc.

I THOUGHT (but can’t find) I read that some would portray death or suicide falsely to conceal from family long prison sentences. But, that would mean that some trials have taken place or they are aware of a reasonable expectation (by lawyer) of life in prison.

Moses told the people to sacrifice the lamb and spread the blood on the mantel to be saved. The choice was an individual one of faith and obedience, God did not force the Jewish people to obey and be delivered from the passover. Free will.

Choose wisely, but one must needs choose!

I’m not sure if I agree with your interpretation of 28 and 30.

But I do share your concern about suicide.

Here is another thing I find very troubling: How does Q know the exact day and time of no name’s death.

I HOPE the answer is that the date and time are a lie, that either he is not dead or else he’s been long dead and the white hats would NOT be involved in either murder or suicide. If so, they are not white hats in my book.

So, assuming that the Q team / white hats are good guys, that leaves me with the conclusion that no name is alive or was dead long before it was announced. In fact he would have to have been dead before Q’s post of a month ago.

I’m inclined to believe he’s alive and that he’s been faking illness all this time in preparation to run or to have a ready made excuse when arrested.

Going with the first guess, I’m thinking Q has been watching all along and that no name was probably arrested on or before the Q’s post last month. If so, what recourse would the DS have? Think about that!! Could they protest no name’s arrest? Not really. Because if they did, the whole scheme would be exposed. It would be clear that he was not sick, that he’d been faking it for all these months! It would probably also be clear that he’d had plastic surgery in an attempt to make a run for it.

How would no name and the DS explain that???? Bwahahahaha!