Replies

[RE: discussion regarding texokie’s report on Beatles’ “PAUL” findings.]
little jeremiah said:

Didn’t mean to pound you

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I appreciate that very much. We ARE Friends! :-)

I’m glad to know now about this Gibson guy. You did the right thing to tell me about him.

However, I went back to look, and I was not able to find that the links I posted were attributable to him. I realize I could have missed it, but as I said, I’m not very adept at dealing with youtube format.

I also cited a book, and I don’t think that was attributable to Gibson either. The point is, that there actually seem to be several sources examining this highly controversial topic. The theory is being examined. I honestly think my post raised some legitimate questions.

I really pondered if I had erred in posting the results of my bunny dive into the Beatles. I could not understand the blowback I seemed to be getting. According to the standards I seek to follow in examining and reporting information, this topic seemed relevant. Did I somehow violate those standards? Not only my personal ones, but even those of this thread as well?

I was replying to a comment in which Beatle John Lennon’s MKUltra killer - was mentioned. This “Paul” data seemed to be a very legitimate topic which seemed in my mind to be relevant to the discussion.

I expected debate. Of Points, and the Data I brought. Not besmirching of my sources, - which upon inspection, do not seem to be the sources I used. If I used bad sources, I tender apology - if I did use a bad source it was inadvertent.

But I was not seeking to say those sources are correct. I was reporting what I found regarding the topic. I was blown away by it, as it was the first I had heard of it. I was hoping others had explored this and had come to some conclusions already. I was hoping that if this was a fruitless topic, that actual reasons - based on refutation of the data, would be offered.

If I had transgressed, I could not figure out what the violations might have been.

Then I realized there is a very obvious connection to previous researching I (and others) had done which, in my opinion, had been overlooked. I think it ought to be at least considered before rejecting the examination of the Beatles topic outright:

In a recent research series involving not only my work, but with help of several of our outstanding researchers, we examined the roots and the skullduggery at Laurel Canyon, California.

We examined its roots back to the early 1900s. We saw how a number of people from the upper-connected Cabal class from England were part of the bunch who settled in Laurel Canyon. We saw how they had enough juice to get the LA City government to spring for sending the first trolley lines to that canyon area.

We learned that Laurel Canyon was a major locus for CIA/Intel/MKUltra/Rock-Music operations. These activities are well documented and known to many who examine such things.

Why would it be such a stretch to think that ENGLAND’s Intel/Cabal people - who sent reps from ENGLAND to America to start operations - would not have similar Intel/ Mind Control operations on their home soil?

What if the Beatles were equally the intelligence ops involved band that we now see that many of the early major American rock-music musicians were?

Talented and beloved musicians all, but IMHO it behooves us to look a little deeper at them and who was using them, or controlling them....or even whom might some of THEM have been using?

I don’t know. Just asking.

I wonder if I got blowback because I might have gotten over some kind of target without realizing it?

Naaaaaaaah. Couldn’t possibly be THAT! .....Could it?
We’ve never seen that here before.