Replies

44 is either BHO or Hussein.
Not BO.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~
FWIW, before my computer blew up last spring I was analyzing and collecting ALL references to Obama in Q. I have only partially reconstructed it, but even so, I can report that during the early drops, Obama was indeed referred to fairly consistently as “BO.” Then the reference in later drops changed to “Hussein.” Once in a while an “Obama” is seen. Sometimes his title “President” is used.

I did not have “BHO” on my work sheet, so I just looked it up on two aggregators. I am not today finding any search references to “BHO” which surprises me. I had thought there was at least one reference to that.

I have just consulted the file in which I gathered that information and checked it against current drops. It seems I will need to re-do my analysis from scratch, because some drop numbers have changed, and at this point, I’m even wondering, if the drops themselves have changed. Strange.

The first reference to “Hussein,” in my reconstructed work sheets from a few months ago, shows no “Husseins” until #524. I’m now seeing references to “Hussein” in earlier drops in the 200’s, which surprised me greatly! Perhaps I just missed them, for I was not yet looking for “Husseins”, but “BOs” at that stage of my document reconstruction.

I do verify that today there are still early drops which do refer to Obama as “BO.”

Pertaining to your above conversation, Cletus and pa_dweller, I would concur that “BO” in later drops now probably should be considered to stand for “Bruce Ohr,” (or “Board Owner,” if a trip code conversation is taking place.) It is context for “BO” in the drops which is the key to which meaning applies, imho.

In most recent drops, the “BO” is given little context, so we are, (as well as the Cabal), perhaps by design, to not be 188% sure if the BOs we are seeing are “Ohr” or “Obama!” In that obscure non-context, Q may even be using both! The precedent would be the references to “JC.”