1911 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0b7c69 No.2628837 📁 Aug 16 2018 12:07:20 (EST) NEW Anonymous ID: 79d84f No.2628758 📁 Aug 16 2018 12:02:59 (EST) NEW >>2628721 Never have I been so proud to be an Army Soldier! Hooah! >>2628758 Hooah! Soldier. Thank you for your service. God bless. Q >>2628768 It should be clear in this context ES = @Snowden It should be clear based on prev drop re: game comms why ES was included. It should be clear that 'ES' was used in both (GOOG + @Snowden) drops to est a link. Q
1911 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0b7c69 No.2628837 📁 Aug 16 2018 12:07:20 (EST) Anonymous ID: 79d84f No.2628758 📁 Aug 16 2018 12:02:59 (EST) >>2628721 Never have I been so proud to be an Army Soldier! Hooah! Anonymous ID: ff083b No.2628768 📁 Aug 16 2018 12:03:27 (EST) So, aha, Q You now have half the board thinking ES is Eric Schmidt and the other half think ES is Edward Snowden Please confirm which >>2628758 Hooah! Soldier. Thank you for your service. God bless. Q >>2628768 It should be clear in this context ES = @Snowden It should be clear based on prev drop re: game comms why ES was included. It should be clear that 'ES' was used in both (GOOG + @Snowden) drops to est a link. Q
Tweet fromJulian Assange’s mother. WOW.
https://mobile.twitter.com/AssangeMrs/status/1030015511365484544
It should be clear in this context ES = @Snowden
It should be clear based on prev drop re: game comms why ES was included.
It should be clear that ‘ES’ was used in both (GOOG + @Snowden) drops to est a link.
Okay, so in the current context ES is Snowden because game comms was his “baby”. But, ES=Schmidt is still in play because of interplay of GOOG and @snowden.
Q uses ‘ES’ for either one unless they are simultaneously involved then ES=Schmidt, specifically.
Gotta review past drops for context.