Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EinNYC

I’m curious: what is the proper way to put down an animal? I always thought a bullet to the head was relatively quick and humane, but I don’t really know...


3 posted on 08/13/2018 9:28:57 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: be-baw

Putting them to sleep is the most humane way. One drug to sedate, one to stop the heart. They are all heartbreaking. Its bad enpugh when they have to put one down because they are too ill to save.


16 posted on 08/13/2018 11:07:15 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw

Long time ago when I did a little ranching we usually used a bullet to brain box, sometimes frangible s depending on surface area. Later I worked with a vet and we gave then a medical concoction( injectable) and they felt no pain, just went to sleep. Either one is efficient. Sorry to kitties lovers but ranches and farms get inundated with stray kitties; have to so something.


17 posted on 08/13/2018 11:19:21 PM PDT by Karliner (Jeremiah29:11,Romans8:28 Isa 17, Damascus has fallen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw

The American Veterinary Association published a manual on acceptable euthanasia techniques, which can be obtained in pdf format. There are many ways to euthanize animals, and some are aesthetically unappealing, to say the least. The goal is to kill the animal (including animal fetuses) as painlessly as possible.


29 posted on 08/14/2018 3:28:44 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw

“I’m curious: what is the proper way to put down an animal? I always thought a bullet to the head was relatively quick and humane, but I don’t really know...”

I’m in agreement. A well placed bullet to the head is quick, painless and the subject literally never knew what hit him.

The social aversion to this has to do more with anti-gun brainwashing. I got into an argument once with a lib over this, and to put down an animal with a gun is considered violent because of all the blood. Near as I can figure it, lefties would rather see an animal suffer than to see them bleed or hold a gun to do the deed.

If you have to kill something, there’s no need for the suffering, just get the damn job done and over with.


37 posted on 08/14/2018 5:17:17 AM PDT by redfreedom (Gun control has proven success! (Such as in Hitler's Germany & Stalin's Russia))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw

A sharp blade to the back of the neck. Driving it into the brain. Quick and probably as painless as it gets. That is for pet sized animals.


46 posted on 08/14/2018 1:04:50 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice, and somewhere else the tea is getting cold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson