Rebuttal (by paragraph)
P1: The economy is roaring and gainful employment can be had. It is the left who are running down the job reports.
P2: Algorithms are designed by people. The likes of which, this persons protends to be! Circular.
P3: Patriots don’t look for a white knight, they look at the Constitution. Plea to emotion.
P4: Pleading to the constitution after emoting about a white knight.
P5: Let’s reach across the aisle. Who is this McNoName?
P6: Admonition based on poster’s position; you are an idiot of you don’t believe me!
P7: We all have belifs, dude. Can’t we all just get along (continuation of P6).
P8: LARP alert! Now for the evidence...
P9: Argument to authority. Piffle. Argument meant to protect FBI/CIA bad actors. They are better than anyone with Q clearance!
P10: Clearly not informed about assignment of Q clearance and the prerogative of POTUS.
P11: Strawman. Hypothetical arguments.
P12: Circular argument back to previously voiced personal conclusions.
P13 - P14: Listen to ME, you idiots!
Technical Discussion
Poster is not an “Infosec expert” and sets out to prove it! Ignore until...
P Last: Plea to emotion. I’m just a pitiful internet guy who has concerns.
This person could have attracted more attention with a “wall of text”...and just as many readeers.
Concern Troll...disregard. Probably Okeydoker.
lol
You know, I think that content is intended for use by the MSM to “frighten” the rest of the country. The whole part about warning us not to undertake any violent action Q asks of us???? You mean like burning one’s wrist on a hot bag of microwave popcorn? Is that what Q meant with the 8 second video of someone watching a movie laughing?
I think the MSM will pounce on this and make it sound scary to people not yet red-pilled (fear Q info) and to the haterz on the left who will claim we are certifiable and tarnish any public figure who speaks positively about Q as advocating for violence. And then MSM, TWITTER, FB, YOUTUBE instantly wash the public sphere of Q Anon content claiming that it’s advocating violence etc. Because, it’s not persuasive to someone who’s followed Q for months and whom Q’s been telling to “enjoy the show.”