Norski wrote: “No. They look the way they do because when you breed for a dog that makes a killing bite, the easily-identifiable physical form accompanies the “killing bite” type.”
You’re still insisting on banning because of how a dog looks.
A vet I know says Pit Bulls are far less likely to bite than many other types of dogs.
Sorry, that is not the case.
I would be happy to go over the discussion points with you. Would you please first read the whole thread, including the other one I posted today on the 57 YO woman mauled to death by a pit bull in Chicago yesterday, and the links I included, and then come back to discuss the issue.
It is apparent that you have come into the discussion without the background information I have supplied in not only both of these threads today, but the ones over the last few months. If you wish to play “catch-up”, you may input “pit bull” in the FR searchline and immerse yourself in the information provided, educating yourself on the subject as I did, and then I would be happy to go further with you. Unfortunately, I must leave now for the morning. Thank you, Norski
Far less likely to bite? Debatable.
BUT, when they bite, oh the consequences.