Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Many strategies are possible.

Suppose you don’t need the money at age 65 but take it anyway, and save it instead of spending it. At age 70, you might have $100k in additional capital to invest. The stream of income from the invested capital would offset your lower SS payments, and might be taxed at a loser rate.


2 posted on 08/02/2018 2:30:59 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proxy_user

I was going to say the same thing.

If you invest it, you’re far better off taking it at 62 and plowing it into an IRA.


6 posted on 08/02/2018 2:35:14 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=600><p>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

“taxed at a loser rate.”

hmmm.... True but never seen it stated exactly like that.


11 posted on 08/02/2018 2:42:11 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

What Is The Most I Can Receive From My Social Security Retirement Benefits?

Have multiple identities : )


93 posted on 08/03/2018 10:32:41 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson