Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FYI...................
1 posted on 08/02/2018 9:22:46 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Red Badger

Tables are wrong, I took at 62 my benefit is above the highest in the table


72 posted on 08/02/2018 10:07:49 AM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bookmark


77 posted on 08/02/2018 10:12:06 AM PDT by freds6girlies (many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first. Mt. 19:30. R.I.P. G & J)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Ping.


82 posted on 08/02/2018 10:18:20 AM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“Depending on who you talk to, experts usually recommend budgeting for 70% to 80% of your pre-retirement income to cover expenses in retirement.”

Here we go with ‘experts’ again. For people planning retirement (and thus making more money than they’re spending), what COUNTS is not what one’s income level is, but rather what one’s EXPENDITURE level is. If you’re making twice what you’re spending, then you’d have to actually INCREASE your retirement spending to get to the 70 to 80% level.

Obviously, the above is possible, particularly if you plan to travel a lot, but I really doubt these ‘experts’ have that in mind. Much more likely is that your travel expenses stay about the same, but you downsize on clothing, housing, and cars...to some extent - so your overall cost of living goes down.

But, as usual, the math is too hard for the leftists who write these articles.


89 posted on 08/02/2018 10:29:13 AM PDT by BobL (I drive a pick up truck because it makes me feel like a man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Take the money when you’re younger. What are you gonna do with the extra at age 90? You can host, but you can’t party.


94 posted on 08/02/2018 10:32:08 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

As I was looking at SS options, there was an option that did not make sense. ( Feds since closed this option but grandfathered in those already on it and if you were born before 1954)

My first response was: Are we nuts ?
My second response was: Do I qualify ?

It’s called a “restricted”.

Read about it here. https://www.thebalance.com/social-security-rules-for-restricted-applications-2388915

My wife an I were born before 1954.
We are both about the same age.
She wanted to continue to work. I didn’t.

She robbed the cradle as she is a couple of months older than me.
I had her hold off filing until I filed.
I filed for full retirement benefits.
She filed a restricted application and got half of my monthly benefit.
Her own SS benefit is growing at approx. 8% a year.
When she turns 70.5 she needs to make a decision on how to file on her own benefit.
Until then, she will have banked approx 50k.

If any of all you all qualify, might be worth it to look into this.
It works best if you are close in age and both are at full retirement age.

This is NOT file and suspend. ( That has different rules )
This is a “Restricted” application.

Good luck...


95 posted on 08/02/2018 10:33:32 AM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.Of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

If you take it before your full retirement age, it will be permanently reduced. You will be limited in the amount of money you can make to $17,040 (in 2018) without having your benefit withheld. If you plan to work and make more than the limit, reconsider.

If you are at or above your full retirement age, consider your life expectancy. The cross-over point where your total benefits received—lower amount for longer time vs higher amount for shorter time—is about age 81. If, based on life-expectancy, you plan to live longer than age 81, waiting is the way to maximize your benefit.

In any consideration... if you need the money, take it.

Medicare and Social Security are separate programs with separate rules. Generally, you apply for Medicare at 65 without variation and independent of Social Security decisions.


102 posted on 08/02/2018 10:39:49 AM PDT by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The answer is as early as you can. There is no guarantee of tomorrow.


103 posted on 08/02/2018 10:42:01 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

It depends on what you are using Social Security for.

If Social Security is to be your primary source of income, take it as early as you can.

If Social Security is to be a backstop, to make sure you never outlive your money, but you are going to be living on accumulated savings or pensions, take it as late as you can.


106 posted on 08/02/2018 10:52:10 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

66 1/2 Nov 2019. Can’t wait.


107 posted on 08/02/2018 10:52:29 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“You can get help from your state paying your Medicare premiums. In some cases, Medicare Savings Programs may also pay Medicare Part A (Hospital Insurance) and Medicare Part B (Medical Insurance) deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments if you meet certain conditions.”

https://www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/help-paying-costs/medicare-savings-program/medicare-savings-programs.html


115 posted on 08/02/2018 11:09:51 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

There’s also the possibility of going on SNAP benefits to delay having to go on Social Security, often for another year or even two.


118 posted on 08/02/2018 11:14:46 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

62, because there’s no guarantee you’ll make it to 66 or 70.


120 posted on 08/02/2018 11:15:47 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Bkmk


123 posted on 08/02/2018 11:21:10 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’m taking it at 62. Wait at your own risk. I’ve known too many people who’s only benefits were the $ 255 burial benefit


140 posted on 08/02/2018 12:36:11 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’ll be filing three months before62. All the rest of the essay assumes you trust SS for anything....


146 posted on 08/02/2018 2:20:17 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Socialist Security is a crime against the “blessings of liberty”, and the enslavement of our posterity.


157 posted on 08/02/2018 6:46:33 PM PDT by Theophilus (Repent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

If you are black or hispanic you should take it early.

This chart is missing lifespan by race.


160 posted on 08/03/2018 6:12:08 AM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson