Be sure to see the "recommended reading" and the Sources.
"Inside the pro-vaccination mind, there is a desire for simplicity and safety. It is easier to believe that vaccines are safe and effective (the Supreme Court has ruled them unavoidably unsafe) than it is to do the research. Despite feigning scientific literacy, the pro-vaxxer is unfamiliar with the counter arguments to vaccination, they simply want to shut down any discourse on vaccine safety. If anyone criticizes anything about vaccines they are deemed “anti-science”. In reality, it is the pro-vaxxer who suffers from delusional views. This is called anosognosia or lack of awareness of a deficit."
I work in the health care industry, and I'm a cancer survivor. Aside from the fact that your "source" for this information is obviously biased, I asked you for proof that vaccines are inherently harmful.
The statement you posted starts with an incorrect premise: most people in our industry are not "pro-vaccine." We are pro-science, and we follow data. We've done the research, but we're open to the scientific method; that is, show us the correlation between autism and vaccines, and we might change our minds.
You end the statement with an argument that the "Global Warming" crowd might make--GW is "settled science" and if I suggest otherwise, I'm delusional.