I work in the health care industry, and I'm a cancer survivor. Aside from the fact that your "source" for this information is obviously biased, I asked you for proof that vaccines are inherently harmful.
The statement you posted starts with an incorrect premise: most people in our industry are not "pro-vaccine." We are pro-science, and we follow data. We've done the research, but we're open to the scientific method; that is, show us the correlation between autism and vaccines, and we might change our minds.
You end the statement with an argument that the "Global Warming" crowd might make--GW is "settled science" and if I suggest otherwise, I'm delusional.
I’m also a cancer survivor.
Does that make me more credible?
"SCIENTISTS AGAINST VACCINES HEAR FROM THOSE WHO HAVE DONE THE RESEARCH"
https://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/scientists-against-vaccines-hear-from-those-who-have-done-the-research