Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BDParrish; dsrtsage
BDParrish: "In the north, people felt that the president had authority to raise troops to put down what amounted to another whiskey rebellion."

It wasn't just a rebellion, it was also an invasion of the Union.
See my post #104 above.

107 posted on 07/26/2018 1:50:04 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

The other thing that happened was south Carolina sent “representatives” to try and talk the other slave states into leaving the Union also. That is plan and simple treason in my book.


109 posted on 07/26/2018 1:53:47 PM PDT by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

Thanks for your response BroJoeK, but I wondered if you missed the point of my comment. Are you re-igniting the pointless debate on the causes of the civil war, or are you suggesting that the Northern people did not fight in response to legitimate authority, that they fought only because they felt invaded and today we would not fight unless we felt invaded.


157 posted on 07/28/2018 2:09:38 PM PDT by BDParrish (One representative for every 30,000 persons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson