Q made a few posts today. Not a huge number (8) by recent standards, but a significant amount. He did make one long, detailed post on why we should "Trust Session." This triggered an influx of Anti-Sessions Freepers who mixed with some disruptor/trolls and the Sessions debate was on like Diddy Kong racing. The way the Oracle sees it, the Sessions argument was triggered by Q and was necessary. So the anti-Sessions trolls did serve a purpose.
The overall tactic of "don't feed the trolls" will be back in place after tonight's Sessions discussion.
Not all will or do agree with the Oracle's opinion on this matter.
Let's see what stories the Oracle is following.
- Jeff Sessions backs [RR] and the usual suspects go Ape S word. Q has something to say about this.
- Facebook board of directors goes after Zuckerfag. PAIN?
- The Donald speaks to US Steel in Illinois.
The Donald speaks to US Steel.
The Donald described how America is being made great again. His points cannot be argued with. The dems will have a hard time countering this come election time. All R's need to jump on this narrative and the Trump Train. They will be unbeatable. Blue wave? Pish posh. Reality trumps (get it?) dem fake talking points every time.
- In a last minute tweet, Representative Meadows says, after consultation with "leadership" (we can assume Paul Ryan, I think) he has decided to drop impeachment of [RR] and go with contempt charges.
- In a related story, Represantive Jim Jordan (one of ours) officially announced his intention to run for the Speakership. It looks like the left's takedown attempt of Jordan has fizzled out. :)
Let's see what Q had to say, and what our team made of it.
#1711 Q posted a link,
This is a piece of writing by Rep. Louis Gohmert on why Mueller is a scumbag.
Then Q had this to say,
What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
Known beforehand?
Optics.
Think logically.
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC? Why is this important?
Why did Sessions recuse?
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Clickbait derails logical thought.
Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
You have a front row seat.
Enjoy the show.This is Q's detailed "Trust Sessions" explanation. This in light of the wobblyness based off of Session's recent apparant support of [RR]. It is the same argument we who have "Trusted Sessions" have been making all along.
It's important to keep in mind that if Sessions DIDN'T support [RR] publically or attacked him, he would come under attack for knowing things he isn't supposed to know about the entire Mueller investigation. Simple logic explains all of the kabuki from Seessions AND Trump.
It's also important to know that Huber reports to Sessions and not [RR] as he normally would with the backing of the Congressional letter of April on criminal referrals that also recommended that [RR] be kept out of the Huber loop.
#1712 Q posts a picture of the nasty comedienne Sarah Silverman holding her cellphone up with a message on it. The message seems to be addressed to the 8chan nerds, telling them to "Stand the F down" and that they dont know what they are dealing with and that there would be "serious repercussions."
Haha.
Q responds with this,
Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry. 6 Because of these, the wrath of God is coming.
-Colossians 3:5
Your evil has no place in this worldThis Q response seems to simply be like as if somebody were holding a crucifix up to a vampire. But Q will have more to say about it in subsequent posts.
#1713 An anon writes, about the Sarah Silverman pic;
Proven shop…
Meaning "photoshop" or fake pic.
Q responds,
The author of the post…..
The face is never the author.
Direct comms come in many different forms.Is Q implying that the author of the attack on 8chan was not Sarah Silverman but somebody else? Somebody deep? Is he saying that this is a "direct comm" from the deep state using the dummy and ignorant Silverman as cover?
I think so. And Q has even more to say on this.
#1714 An anon says,
<i suspected this from the beginning.
shops dont mean the post itself isnt real.He is saying that though the pic may be faked, the message is real.
Q responds,
How do you hide a message in clear sight?
By attributing it to some sleazy celebrity? And still more on this in the next post.
p.s. "Clear sight" and not "Plain sight?" Is that something? (just me).
#1715 You'd be amazed how much is shared on /pol/.
Data exchange.https://guardianproject.info/apps/pixelknot/
/pol/ is an 8chan thing. The link takes you to information on an app called Pixelknot.
What is Pixelknot?
Pixelknot is an Android application that allows users to hide short text-based messages in photographs and share them across trusted channels.
So is Q saying there is a comm buried inside the Silverman pic? He is definitely saying there are some comms buried in /pol/. He has said that before. I assume that the Chan nerds are all over this one. And some of our puterFReeQs as well. Nothing has come back, as of yet, that the Oracle is aware of.
#1716 Q posts a link;
https://www.wsj.com/articles/thank-you-jeff-sessions-1522708237
On Thursday the attorney general released a letter informing Congress that he’d asked Utah-based U.S. Attorney John Huber to investigate lawmakers’ complaints about the Justice Department and the FBI. Turns out Mr. Huber has been working on this investigation, in concert with the Justice Department’s inspector general, since November. The news of Mr. Huber’s appointment came two days after a statement from FBI Director Christopher
This is an article from April in support of Sessions and his appointment of Huber. To read any further, one must subscribe to the website. I refuse. Cause I'm lazy.
This is more grist for the "Trust Sessions" mill.
#1717 Q posts a link.
Then says of it,
Do you understand what is happening?
Think optics.Representative Meadows has "swapped" [RR] impeachment for "contempt of Congress" charges over [RR] refusal to comply with the House subpeona for documents.
This may be a more immediate and better way to get to [RR]. A [RR] found to be in contempt of Congress would be an easier target for resignation, recusal, or termination. It also might make it more politically expediant for Trump to order release of documents. Again, optics.
Due to the late hour of this post, there wasn't much discussion on this late development. Surely it will be discussed more in FReeQtown. The anti's will surely get splody heads. But they lack a fundamental understanding of what is happening, so that's to be expected.
#1718 Q reposts two from March. One says, 100% regulated. Some platforms will collapse under the weight of their illegal activities.
The other said, Track inside sales/divestitures. They know. Watch the sell-off/liquidity events. Facebook Investors Want to Strip Zuckerberg of Chairman Title
Barron's
Shareholder Wants to Oust Zuckerberg as Facebook Chairman
Fortune
Facebook shareholders try to fire Mark Zuckerberg as chairman
Daily Mail
[DC moves slow]It looks like a Q proof to me. There was definitely a sell-off, resulting in a $100 billion loss and the board going after Zuckerfag. It appears that THIS particular platorm is in the midst of collapsing, as Q predicted. How sad.
So ended a contentious night of Q. Thanks to the Sessions discussion, we had some high drama. Not to worry, FReeQs. We have the right of it. It was a "teachable moment" for some, if they cared to use it as such. Q led the way. We either "Trust the plan", which includes "Trust Sessions" or we do not. This includes "Trust Trump" if you ask me. The "Do not feed the trolls" policy is hereby back in effect.
Or at least, leave it to the experts. :)
Until tomorrow, sportsfans, the Storm continues. See ya ‘round the popsicle stand. Same Q time. Same Q channel.
Bagster
