Posted on 07/22/2018 10:00:50 PM PDT by ransomnote
The NSA has it all.
They told me so.......................
If that is the case...then something should happen on the East coast, too.
I just did not know how you transitioned from earthquakes to submarines. :)
It is seriously anti-semite. That angle never made any sense to me.
But what about these two lines?
Future BIG meaning?
Silence is golden.
Bagster
House Speaker Paul Ryan on Tuesday attempted to downplay President Donald Trump's threat to revoke security clearances of former national security officials who have criticized him, brushing it off as just "trolling."
Q
Jul 24 2018 11:38:59 (EST)
You have more than you know.
https://gosar.house.gov/uploadedfiles/criminal-referral.pdf
Q
Looks like your source is right. I would love to know who it is.
I do NOT think the President was trolling. Sarah Sanders would not have mentioned the clearances being revoked if POTUS was “trolling.”
#1682
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 5b7dc4 No.2262557
Jul 24 2018 10:45:27 (EST)
_________________________________________________________
#1683
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: da223e No.2263460
Jul 24 2018 11:38:59 (EST)
________________________________________________________
1. The relative “seis” of the earthquakes (EQs), correlated to past EQ events (cf: NK nuclear mountain “seis”).
2. The location of a recent sea-to-air missile launch (destination seems to be the same; Davey Jones locker).
Don’t count East Coast activity...submarines prowl “The Seas”. The absence of “As The World Turns” in the drop indicates it was the culmination of an operation to interdict BEFORE it could do harm.
Questions for FReeQs:
Would a rogue sub have nuclear material traceable to Russia?
Why would I ask that question?
[I do NOT think the President was trolling.]
Consider the source - CNN! LOL
criminal investigation referral for Comey, Clinton, Lynch Mccabe, Page and Strzok
paging Jack Black!!!!
Great call. Looks like you’ve found someone who has cracked the code on when to expect posts.
If you understand it, can you nutshell it for the rest of us mere mortals?
My thought was that for most things it shouldn't. The SEC deals with securities, but not necessarily with tax fraud. And, its not easy to see how anything about the Clinton Foundation involves securities, unless they borrowed money and issued some sort of notes. There's no investors, at least not in the usual sense.
I would think an investigation of that Foundation could focus in other areas--was it in fact a charity, and if not, it's tax fraud. Were they selling influence--if so, that's a different area of investigation.
Federal prosecutor in Utah working with Sessions and Horowitz.
CNN is almost NOT a source any longer. They are a joke.
I think it works like this: there are lead agencies for different types of crime. For instance the Treasury Dept. / U.S. Marshals are the lead agency for counterfitting. The D.E.A. is the lead agency for drug dealing. And SEC is the lead agency for securities crimes. The FBI is frequently involved in these, but they probably don't have the expertise in stock transactions that SEC does.
What I don't quite get is why the SEC would be involved in the Clinton Foundation. It's not a publicly traded entity, does the SEC have oversight of non-profits? I am not aware of that, but it may be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.