Your opinion is more about epistemology than science. Why is it more credible than a published scientific paper?
>>Your opinion is more about epistemology than science. Why is it more credible than a published scientific paper?
I never claimed that it was more credible. I am questioning its methodology and finding. In your mind, is “science” a thing that can never be questioned except by people who agree with the findings?
This is why “climate change” is settled science!