>>Your opinion is more about epistemology than science. Why is it more credible than a published scientific paper?
I never claimed that it was more credible. I am questioning its methodology and finding. In your mind, is “science” a thing that can never be questioned except by people who agree with the findings?
This is why “climate change” is settled science!
I am questioning its methodology and finding.
...
With what, unsupported terms like “mental masturbation?”
You’re free to your opinion, but that doesn’t mean it’s credible. Bringing up climate change makes your position appear even weaker.