I really liked your response until I got to the “expand your thinking” part which sounds insulting. I’m sure it’s not though :)
I see that too as a possible loophole but from reading tons of articles about his plea deal, and the fact that the prosecutors said they have nothing IT related to charge him with, I don’t see an out.
However, If there is a way for this sob to be charged I want to see it happen as much as anyone. I don’t have any faith that it will.
And I hate Session’s
They already have the IT information from NSA and they don’t need this guy’s testimony, so they didn’t ask about it and may have interrupted his attempts to introduce it.
Dude’s going to be eating Gitmo food for a long time.
"Expand your thinking" is a Q-ism that asks us (as a people) to see things from another perspective. A perspective that includes a Donald Trump Presidential program bring used to "awaken" the population to the dirt that has infested our, and the world's societies for lo these many years.
There was no insult intended, goodlady. In fact, I appreciate your civil tone and the chance to have my interpretations challenged. It's easy to understand how you came to your conclusion, but with a "Q influenced" perspective and a reading of the Awan deal, mine is different.
Here's a thing. If you in fact believe that the Q team is a Presidentially sanctioned operation, and that operation asks us to "trust Sessions," doesn't that indicate that Sessions is part of "the plan?"
I'm on board until The President, through his Q op, tells me otherwise, or he terminates him. Until then, I will "trust Sessions."
Feel free to hate him. The more people on our side that badmouth him, the more the plan is effective. You right wing "Sessions haters" do serve a role in the plan.
No offense.
Bagster
