Please go do some research. I have read what you posted and do not agree with your interpretation.
If he murdered someone in Utah, yes he of course could be prosecuted. However, what he was charged with has been dropped, It’s just as simple as that.
Friend, I am not here to argue with you and do respect your opinion. I just don’t agree.
If I am wrong, I am wrong, simple as that.
What he was charged with was bank fraud. And a rather low level incident of that. Lying on a loan application.
Even double jeopardy doesn't come into play in his case, on top of the court ruling that ANY other prosecutorial action on OTHER charges was still viable. The court was very clear.
This is really very simple to understand and not really subject to "interpretation."
Bagster
No, I posted the text of the deal not my interpretation, you are wrong.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/press-release/file/1077546/download
3. Additional Charees
After the entry of your client’s plea of guilty to the offense identified in paragraph 1
above, your client will not be charged with any non-violent criminal offense in violation of
Federal or District of Columbia law which was committed within the District of Columbia by
your client prior to the execution of this Agreement and about which this Office was made aware
by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement, all of which is contained in the attached
Statement of Offense. However, the United States expressly reserves its right to prosecute your
client for any crime of violence, as defined in 18 U.S.C. $ l6 and./or 22D.C. Code $ 4501, if in
fact your client committed or commits such a crime of violence prior to or after the execution of
this Agreement.