No, I posted the text of the deal not my interpretation, you are wrong.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/press-release/file/1077546/download
3. Additional Charees
After the entry of your client’s plea of guilty to the offense identified in paragraph 1
above, your client will not be charged with any non-violent criminal offense in violation of
Federal or District of Columbia law which was committed within the District of Columbia by
your client prior to the execution of this Agreement and about which this Office was made aware
by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement, all of which is contained in the attached
Statement of Offense. However, the United States expressly reserves its right to prosecute your
client for any crime of violence, as defined in 18 U.S.C. $ l6 and./or 22D.C. Code $ 4501, if in
fact your client committed or commits such a crime of violence prior to or after the execution of
this Agreement.
Are we talking about crimes of violence in an IT case now?
Sorry, I am lost.
What I am saying is that he can not be charged with anything related to his IT work.
And who am I blaming for that? Session’s
So if they discover any crimes not disclosed....he can be prosecuted
Show me the man and I will show you the crime.