Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo
RE: Your previous post "Neon Revolt: Who is Qanon?"

"... we’re all expecting the internet to go down at a certain point"

We are?

I'm not. The Internet is far too integrated into too many things to be intentionally taken down by some cabal of Deep State operatives. If they even had the theoretical power to do so, which I doubt.

The Internet has been designed to stay up and route around failure.

I do not expect it to go down. The only feasible was to do that would be take take the entire electric grid down, I suspect.

A huge number of deaths would result from that, obviously.

231 posted on 07/12/2018 9:32:41 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black

On the whole, Neon Revolt has some good information, but if you read the entire article, he goes a bit too far off the deep end for even my tastes.


235 posted on 07/12/2018 9:47:21 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

hey Jack,

firstly, some of the stuff below is for all reading this and i in no way am trying to insult your intelligence so please dont misread what i am saying here, it is meant as an interest piece for readers here.

is it possible to ‘bring the internet down’ other than power outages, actually it would be possible. easy no, impossible, nope. but first a little clarification on wording.

its best to clarify here, if by internet you mean the server backbone that services like the web runs on then that is very difficult to disrupt. most people mix the web and the internet. technically they are 2 different beasts. the web ‘runs on’ the internet backbone. shutting ‘the internet down’ would require shutting servers (or denial attacks) down and as you rightly say power outages over a long period of time would be a way of doing that.

you could cause a lot of serious disruption by simply getting behemoth companies like microsoft, apple and google to redirect traffic (and they are both closely integrated into the US government already - well the liberal part at least). if any of these companies was told by the US to ‘stop’ i can guarantee you they would. on a related note in 2010 sen liebermann wanted a internet kill switch bill in congress created for presidential access. not sure how far that went tbh.

for the average user you could quite easily disrupt access. there is 100 to 200 root zone servers situated in hiddenish locations across the globe controlled by a independent org called ICANN. think of these servers as the central source of truth and all info is propagated from them (okay thats a simplification but stay with me). so when you contact a website the text you write is checked against a domain name server for the real address. if you wanted to ‘blind’ a population rerouting these addresses to the point that they never reply would be possible to do. also i would bet a huge percentage of people are pointing their browsers to googles’s dns servers (8.8.8.8), so interfering even at that level would screw up a lot of access. the vast bulk of people have no idea even how to change their dns server address or even what they are.

so by way of example what port number does our inbound email work on, your outbound port number? imagine microsoft, apple, and google closed these ports? email outages for the vast majority of the country would close. by changing 2 areas, email and browsing is down. (it would not be easy but it is definitely doable). another way would be to disable to login server verification process that checks your pwd. if you always got that to send a ‘fail’ notification, you could never login.

so if you wanted to ‘shut it down’ by simply interfering in the core companies would mean a huge swathe of people would suddenly be left with devices that wont ‘work’. lets be honest the average consumer has not a clue how this works...it just does..and they will use that ignorance to control.
in the US the govt has the ability to stop tv transmissions, they can control phones and in most countries even ham radio’s are registered (i.e. they know who and where you are). im not saying this is easy but governments definitely have that ability. its frequently done in dodgier parts of the world. recently turkey ‘killed’ social media access if i recall and so did (is) Iran not to mention chinas own ‘firewall’.

you would not need to shut it down, you can redirect to a server you control. a ‘mini me’ version of this is happening already with conservatives blocked on youtube, twitter, facebook as we speak.

so the definition of shutting the internet down needs to be considered. imagine you typed freerepublic.com and the CNN homepage appeared. imagine all of a sudden all the websites you use for alt-news...gets redirected. sure you could put in the ip address of free republic but how many here know it, i sure dont. will there be an underground, yep, in fact you would probably see the darknet take on a whole new interest. the issue is that is probably, what, say 3-5 % of the population at best.

its not something that would be easy of cheap...but it is doable.

just my opinion.


629 posted on 07/13/2018 4:03:51 AM PDT by Irishguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson