Thanks for explaining about the op sec concerns about them exposing their quiet little nest by routinely routing HRC’s data to them in NK. That really WOULD have been dum on their part. (But Q tells us these people are stupid...)
I just told you everything I know about computer networking systems. Which ain’t anything!
The Awan/Huma/Pakistani route makes as much sense as any, since they seem to be the point guys for getting the data out of her and the DNC server(s).
*texokie is sitting under the baby grand resorting to cookies in order to cope with the stress posed by trying to figure out the Server(s) Question. She is really happy Steven W. and others are there to talk to her in kindergarten words so she can follow all of it.*
this is a pretty good piece that adds to my questions about the inconsistencies presented in the Mule + [RR] + [Ed] indictment(s) today: http://dailytorch.com/2018/07/mueller-indicts-russia-for-hacking-the-dnc-and-podesta-but-when-did-wikileaks-actually-get-the-emails/
Body Language analysis snippet of Strozk and his lawyer behind him. According to this analysis, she is theorizing that the lawyer is the handler and was in on the skullduggery, because he shows the indications of personal memory during some of the questions.