To: TXnMA
Though that article is a couple of years old, it’t pretty amazing. However, it must have been a special bulk price offer. Also, they said PC’s drove twice as many support calls. However, if there are ten times as many PC’s, that’s actually less support calls per 100 workstations.
83 posted on
07/12/2018 5:40:39 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: cuban leaf
I understood IBM's "twice" figure to be per workstation...
The savings apparently weren't on hardware or software pricing, they were on reduced support cost.
Did you notice that they were supporting 90,000 Macs with only two (2) IT Techs?
TXnMA
84 posted on
07/12/2018 6:54:17 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias; "0bama": Allah's stooge; "Moderate Muslims": Allah's useful idiots.)
To: cuban leaf
Though that article is a couple of years old, itt pretty amazing. However, it must have been a special bulk price offer. Also, they said PCs drove twice as many support calls. However, if there are ten times as many PCs, thats actually less support calls per 100 workstations. No, Cuban, its per user, not per OS. Do you seriously think that IBM made that stupid of a mistake? They are SAVING over $500 per user over four years. You dont do that by making stupid accounting mistakes.
126 posted on
07/12/2018 10:42:33 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson