Posted on 07/03/2018 11:30:25 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Well, thank you goodman. I really am a nice guy. Except when I'm not nice. :)
I think Q is exactly what he purports to be.
Everybody knows what he/they/it purports to be, most of all you, who have been anti-Q propagandizing for months now.
Bagster
What does “Q” purport to be?
I have been given clearances everywhere but this entity seems non-existent.
“You really don’t smell something fishy?”
I asked my Jet Blue pilot pals about it when it first made the news. Both of them, independently, said essentially the same thing, that it would be some (dummy) punching in the wrong code because “radio” and “hijack” are similar codes and the pilot either wasn’t paying close attention to what he was entering or he remembered wrong. I asked one of them again this morning and he still thinks that is all that it was.
Once the pilot transmitted the hijack code the airport security was going to go through their hijack protocol no matter what the pilot tried doing to cancel it. Embarrassing for the pilot, scary for the passengers.
“Also, it seems if it was a an inadvertent button pushing error, why wouldn’t the passengers reboard the same plane?”
The plane had a real mechanical malfunction, the radio didn’t work. They won’t reboard passengers on a plane with a mechanical issue, they find other seats for them. Another plane if one is available, or on other flights.
Hard to understand why the code for hijacking in progress isn’t something easy to remember (like 9999) and hard to confuse with anything else.
Makes me wonder whether the ‘confusion’ was on the receiver’s end and not the pilots.
The pilots told me that there’s only three transponder codes that they really have to know- 7500, 7600, 7700- hijack, comm failure, and emergency respectively.
I agree that it would seem smart to differentiate ‘hijack’ a bit more from the other two.
“Makes me wonder whether the confusion was on the receivers end and not the pilots.”
The error was the pilot’s, because at the ATC end they would see a hijack alert announcement along with the rest of the plane’s info, rather than the raw code.
Turns out that you and the pure and good Q (All Praise to Him) are correct. It was not a simple missed digit on an airline transponder. It was indeed a massive conspiracy by the deep state to facilitate foreign actors seizing control of all commercial airlines. Everyone is in on it. The pilots, the ground crews, the FAA, the police, the ticket agents, the caterers, the baggage handlers, the airplane toilet tank service truck operators.
Have to run. Unmarked van outside. Will communicate later. Set decoder rings to stun.
Hail Q!!
I'm sensing sarcasm.
:)
Bagster
You know. Not gonna play.
Make your point if you have one.
I'm a busy Bagster.
Bagster
From post #233... "Guys. Take the time to read this. It's a fair rendering of the Q psyop"
I'm inclined to agree, its a government psyop.
RAID!!!
so your premise is the deep state is dropping clues on the internet to expose all the evil and corruption the deep state is up too, BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
ad hominem posts and taglines, lol pathetic.
Decoding now...
...Deep...State...Still...Monitoring...Our...Thoughts...Apply..More...Foil
obviously you don’t read Q
he’d do something more like this
LOL see if you can decode the ‘hidden message’
They call us name[S].
They make t[H]reats.
They censor.
They l[i]e.
They project[t].
T[h]ey cheat.
They steal.
Th[e]y harm.
They [a]re sick.
They are evil.
At some point the streets (for them) will not be safe.
They want you DIVIDE[D]!
Q
Was the airplane incident a mis-entered digit on a transponder?
Or was it a massive Secrit Conspiracy involving hundreds/thousands?
If you're in possession of an IQ above room temperature you pick answer one, and laugh off number two.
The Q cultists aren't idiots, and at some level they know number two is nonsense - BUT they are members of a fantasy-based cult that needs a steady stream of fresh fantasies in order to exist. So massive secrit conspiracy it is.
Get well.
get lost..
Lol...no that's not my premise doofus, but that is your strawman.
Pro tip: You might want to go back to #233 and review.
lol Show me where Q said anything about a transponder code,
that is the fatal flaw in all the ANTI Q BS
it is never from Q
such a lame attempt to discredit one person by using the statement of another person as your “proof” it’s pathetic
and we all see though it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.