Posted on 06/29/2018 10:40:30 PM PDT by ransomnote
For me, it's never trust a MAN with two last names. Generally the sign of a cuck.
More likely clapper Brennan power rice. Are the news sources. But they don’t use thier name they say the “the intelligence community”
My take is deep state is trying to throw shade on Trump’s accomplishment.
I think you are correct about the big question Q mentions.
Holy moley!
You know who Randy Johnson is. How did THAT happen???
And if that {chirp} is a reference to when he nailed that pigeon, I have a renewed respect for you, Miss Mears. I'll adopt you as my cool internet granny.
Bagster
You answer is the most reasonable set forth here.
Is it MAGICAL ending time yet? Enough of that half-breed’s crap.
She’s cute!
“You know who Randy Johnson is. How did THAT happen???”
—
Three sons,three grandsons——all baseball lovers.:-)
.
Yea, you're right. Those indictments will just sit there until they rot away. Nobody is planning any further action on them. It's all kabuki. All politicians are the same. We have a one party government. Trump is just like all the rest of them. He's probably in it for the money and I know he hates children, Mexicans, and women.
Yea. You've convinced me to give up hope and go back to sleep.
JUST KIDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The opposite.
Bagster
“When are we going to see those indictments unsealed?”
We’ve been talking lately about what’s the BIIIG Question. To me, the question of when we get to unwrap some of them Hubermas Presents is one of the biggest questions of all.
I believe the way that it is planned to be executed the venue can be chosen by the prosecutor to be in a court of choice and not forced to be in DC, i.e. a venue that is more proximal to the crime or other but I am pretty confident hat all of this energy with Hubers team is NOT gonna pile up in DC
Makes them easier to arrest, element of surprise.
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure / Rule 6
(e) ... (4) Sealed Indictment. The magistrate judge to whom an indictment is returned may direct that the indictment be kept secret until the defendant is in custody or has been released pending trial. The clerk must then seal the indictment, and no person may disclose the indictment's existence except as necessary to issue or execute a warrant or summons.
-- Isn't the purpose of sealing indictments to keep negative publicity off targets or to secure investigations? Like stuff that could lead to bigger fish? --
The prosecutor is indifferent about negative publicity, unless it taints the jury pool and makes seating a jury a bigger chore than usual. Investigations are totally unimpeded, one way or another. The prosecutor is allowed to let a perp run free if he wants it to lead to the nest. I have not studied "duration an indictment remained under seal" data, but my guess is most are unsealed withing a day, and there might be a flier our there in the months range, pending a person entering the country, etc.
I don't think they'd exist otherwise. Unless some of them were used for leverage to, say, get CEO's or politicians to resign.
Hmmmmmm.
Bagster
John F'n Kerry and who else?
Bagster
Throw shade? They're trying to bust up the whole deal.
The dirty rats.
Bagster
Was the {chirp} about the pigeon? I must know.
Bagster
Can anybody link to the comments section on the Manchurian article?
Good analysis.
I think that's like my third derp of the day. My only excuse, I never saw that. But still. I'm sposed to get all jokes.
Time for a break.
And you're probably not even from New York. I didn't check. Double derp.
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.