[nopardons]

What IS this?

Yes, I went to the link, read some of it, but don't understand what I'/m looking at. WHAT AM I MISSING?

[Hostage]

For Q followers, Q posts have occasionally suggested viewers keep track of the resignations as they have meaning.

For non-Q enthusiasts, the existence of ~35,000 resignations of CEOs and top officials is unprecedented as is the existence of about the same number of DOJ sealed indictments which is unheard of in terms of numbers.

[poconopundit]

The first question that comes to mind is: what is the normal annual turnover among CEOs?

Well, I googled and found a Feb 2018 story in the New York Post: CEO turnover is the highest it’s been in 8 years

And there's a good discussion of possible reasons for the higher number of resignations.  It also says one-quarter of the execs remain at the company in another capacity.

My analysis: With Trump onboard, we're in a new economic for companies.  Rather than a CEO holding his cards close to the vest — as you needed to do in the high-tax/high-regulation Obama years — today there's an emphasis on expansion and hiring.

CEOs must also address major shifts, such as the growing power of "digital businesses" as this chart suggests.

One company, Amazon, who doesn't even show up on this list of high-profit firms, is now a $178 billion powerhouse widely disrupting the marketplace.  Amazon is probably forcing many CEO changes, particularly in the retail business.

So there are good business reasons to put a new kind of CEO at the helm these days. 

As to wider swamp-clearing causes of these resignations, well, I think more evidence is needed to back up that claim.