A fascinating read, and credible. What puzzles me is: why hide the attempted hi-jacking? Is the public so pansy that they cannot handle it? Also, no one reported anyone being taken into custody off of the Jet Blue flight, yet the plane was reportedly stormed by armed security.
The first media report was a communication problem - a really thin cover. Then they clarified by saying that the pilot accidentally sent a wrong code, still too thin.
Still, why hide an attempted hi-jacking? It seems to serve no purpose.
I could only guess it’s because it was hijacking via some yet unknown technology...
It was (by this theory) an e-hijacking; a remote ‘hack’ as it were of the guidance and control systems. I infer that the substitution of fraudulent Chinese parts was done so as to disallow manual override in certain conditions.
Maybe because the hijacker's name might be recognized or searchable, and the purpose and motivation would be too much for the MSM-13 media to cover up.
Wouldn’t a report of an attempted hijacking be a convenient excuse for liar news outlets to divert viewers away from the Rosenscammer to the clash-bang-gong noisemakers running nonstop headlines such as “BREAKING: JET BLUE FIGHT YADAYADA HIJACKED!”?
you can’t dislclose something like that - no one would fly anymore - stock prices downnnnnnnnnnnn
I read an account that said all persons were taken off the plane and not all returned to the plane after questioning. I haven’t seen verification of that - just one account. But, the truth is out there!
People not flying, for fear of being hijacked, would be a big financial hit to the airlines.