Posted on 06/27/2018 10:00:55 PM PDT by ransomnote
Another occurrence of “future proves past” ;)
BOOM!
A fascinating read, and credible. What puzzles me is: why hide the attempted hi-jacking? Is the public so pansy that they cannot handle it? Also, no one reported anyone being taken into custody off of the Jet Blue flight, yet the plane was reportedly stormed by armed security.
The first media report was a communication problem - a really thin cover. Then they clarified by saying that the pilot accidentally sent a wrong code, still too thin.
Still, why hide an attempted hi-jacking? It seems to serve no purpose.
Right after the SecureDrop posts happened ... they posted a fix for a security flaw; posted links to such here at the time. There was a backdoor through their key handling as I recall such that the ‘company’ (black or white) could hook in. Impression is/was that then anything that whistle blowers submit anything, they were turning it over to others without knowing or realizing.
I wasn't paying close attention to his answer, beyond his refusal to say one way or the other if he read it before he signed it.
"Attorney General" means the Attorney General of the United States (or Acting Attorney General), the Deputy Attorney General, or, upon the designation of the Attorney General, the Assistant Attorney General designated as the Assistant Attorney General for National Security under section 507A of title 28.
50 USC 1801(g), defines "AG" for purposes of running the FISA process.
RR also responded poorly to the question about his personal conflict of interest in oversight of Mueller's investigation into "obstruction of justice when Trump fired Comey."
One thing I've found over a period of many years, the legal rules are not applied. They are stretched to fit. All of this stuff works on a political level, with some mighty strained application of rhetoric to make it appear as though the procedure followed the rules and applied the law.
Throw the rulebook out. It's like the old saw about the accountant candidate who, when asked by the prospective employer "How much is two plus two?" Closed the door and replied "How much do you want it to be?" He got the job. Same for those in the legal industry. In spades.
I can't think of who SCR is.
But, a person who has died will not appear in the SSDI unless their death is reported to the SSA. I have a friend who died a while back who has never shown up in the Death Master File, so I assume her death was never reported. Same with a few relatives in my family tree, including a great aunt who was in the SSDI in 2000 but whose record disappeard from it later on.
The SSDI isn't very accurate.
Brock is David Brock. Dorsey is Jack Dorsey. Corsi is still fat...
Q is telling us there is nothing new under the sun! The DS (satan worshippers) have been using the same playbook since the garden. Deception, trickery, appeal to the personal desires of the unsuspecting, scared, or lustful!
Future proves past, “We have it all!” Because Q knows the past with evidence, it is easy to read the tea leaves and stay ahead of the evil doers with blinders on.
They are stupid because they are led by the nose and are incapable or original or critical thought. Trust the Plan! We are Winning! Bigly!
(IMPORTANT NOTICE It turns out there is a very good reason why Q is always saying to re-read the crumbs or Drops! THEYVE CHANGED! Future DOES affect the Past! Below are some of the changes I have observed in the Drops just through the letter A plus one thing I noticed that makes a big difference in the Loop definition.)
PLEASE VOLUNTEER!
Swordmaker needs curator FreeQs to compare sections of the
LexiQon with the referenced Q drops in the Aggregator Site used to find
anything that may have been amended by Q since the Drop was first put up. If you can help,
Please Freepmail Swordmaker so a section of the LexiQon can
be assigned so no FreeQs are duplicating anothers efforts. Thanks! Swordmaker
Todays revisions and additions:
- Brock Dorsey: (#1643) Supposed author of Qanon: The Path To Dictatorship, a strange theory on a strange website that seems to espouse fringe theories combining Nihilism, mild White-supremacism, elitism, nationalism, rightism, and a host of other vague isms, under the title of Amerika. Like most of the writers featured on Amerika, the name Brock Dorsey appears to be pseudonymous as Google and Internet searches for other articles or even their existence aside from that website is fruitless. (Credit FreeQs Jack Black, Little Jeremiah). Most likely Brock Dorsey is a pseudonym for David Brock, an erstwhile conservative writer during the 1980s who penned such exposés as The Real Anita Hill. The writing style seems to be a match. Brock remade himself into a rabid progressive mouthpiece writer when he was outed as a homosexual. Later founded the extreme leftist media watchdog group Media Matters for America also founded super PACs called American Bridge 21st Century designed to elect Hillary Clinton president. Brock was connected for a while as the homosexual partner of Alafantis of Pizzagate notoriety. (See Bridge, HRC, Media Matters).
- Corsi: (#1438) Jerome Robert Corsi is an American author, political commentator, and conspiracy theorist best known for his two New York Times Best Selling books: The Obama Nation, Unfit for Command, Wheres the Birth Certificate?, and Killing the Deep State. First an avid Q supporter and prolific YouTube Q commentator, Corsi performed an amazing instantaneous 180 and became an extreme critic, calling Q a fake, and a hoax, when Q started criticizing commentators who were using Q Drops as a means of monetization by selling books and producing clicks, obviously targeting Corsi stopping just short of naming him. In 2017, he became the Washington, D.C. bureau chief for the conspiracy theory website InfoWars. (Plus, in a nod to our esteemed publisher of the Oracle,FreeQ bagster, he is slightly obese.)
- Susan Rice: (#1623) Ex-Obama National Security Advisor from 2013 to 2017.
- Who just joined the Board of Netflix?: (#1623) Ex-Obama National Security Advisor from 2013 to 2017 Susan Rice.
Revisions and Additions made In the Last LexiQon Update:
- Freemasons: (#1630) Members of organized Freemasonry or Masonry which consists of fraternal organisations that trace their origins to the local fraternities of stonemasons, which from the end of the fourteenth century regulated the qualifications of stonemasons and their interaction with authorities and clients. The degrees of freemasonry retain the three grades of medieval craft guilds, those of Apprentice, Journeyman or fellow (now called Fellowcraft), and Master Mason. These are the degrees offered by Craft (or Blue Lodge) Freemasonry. Members of these organisations are known as Freemasons or Masons. There are additional degrees, which vary with locality and jurisdiction, and are usually administered by different bodies than the craft degrees. The basic, local organisational unit of Freemasonry is the Lodge. The Lodges are usually supervised and governed at the regional level (usually coterminous with either a state, province, or national border) by a Grand Lodge or Grand Orient. There is no international, worldwide Grand Lodge that supervises all of Freemasonry; each Grand Lodge is independent, and they do not necessarily recognise each other as being legitimate. Modern Freemasonry broadly consists of two main recognition groups. Regular Freemasonry insists that a volume of scripture is open in a working lodge, that every member profess belief in a Supreme Being, that no women are admitted, and that the discussion of religion and politics is banned. Continental Freemasonry is now the general term for the "liberal" jurisdictions which have removed some, or all, of these restrictions. Some scholars attribute the formation of the Masons to the destruction of the Knights Templar and the Masons being established to continue their legacy. Q states in Drop # 1632 that "Most all powerful organizations have sinister components. With power comes corruption." Implying that we should not condemn all Masons because of corrupt members.
- Jarrod W. Ramos: (#1633) Senior law enforcement officials state that 38-year-old Jarrod Warren Ramos is the man in custody.suspected of shooting five people to death inside the offices of Marylands Capital Gazette newspaper on June 28, 2018. Ramos allegedly had a long standing dispute with the paper in the past, even suing them in court for criminal defamation in 2012, a case that a judge later tossed due to the fact the data published was factual and readily available to the public. He allegedly opened fire with a shotgun at the publications Annapolis, MD headquarters, reportedly targeting victims according to news outlets. Q later links to an archive of Ramos rambling Verizon page supposedly justifying his lawsuit and Q suggests investigators look at the final graphic used by Ramos, which is apparently his family crest, or coat of arms.
Most likely this is a custom designed vanity fake that anyone could purchase from ads in the backs of magazines in the 50s through 70s.
- Kennedy: (#1603) Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who on June 27, 2018, in a letter to President Trump, announced his retirement from the active bench to Senior Status as of July 31, 2018. While normally considered a conservative Justice, Kennedy had often been a swing vote, i.e. the deciding vote, in 4 to 5 vote on important social issues such as gay weddings and abortion rights.
- Mr. VIP: (#1582, #1621) A specific person who Tweets under the name Q_AnonBaby wearing a Q emblazoned shirt at a Trump rally whom Trump point to twice during two separate rallies and mentioned twice in Q Drops, first in a link to a Twitter photo in Drop #1582, and then again in Drop #1621. President Trump demonstrates complete awareness of Q with such acknowledgement. (See VIP).
- VIP, VIPs: (#1603) Persona wearing a Q emblazoned shirta at Trump ralliwa whom Trump points to during the rally. Generally these people have been selected to sit in the first row at the Rallies and given a VIP pass. President Trump demonstrates complete awareness of Q with such acknowledgement.(See Mr. VIP).
I could only guess it’s because it was hijacking via some yet unknown technology...
Because a huge swath of the media is controlled by a few billionaires and they want more complete control. FR is a treasure worth defending. If Hildebeest had won then net neutrality would have been pushed and who knows where that might have ended? Already we see the search engines and the social media selecting who gets seen / heard and who doesn't.
But you know all this, of course. :^)
May be... I am picturing armed security blasting away at technology... ;^D
I can’t find the Q post here so I’ll reply here. Going back to Q’s comment on the NK news. So the story first appears from NBC news who relies on an “unnamed source”. Then NBC quotes some outfit 38north.com, which if you go to their site...is down! AWWW! How convenient. 38 North is a project of The Henry L. Stimson Center. The Stimson Center was founded in 1989 by Barry Blechman and Michael Krepon, two deep state trolls that were all for Barry’s Iran deal. That is all you need to know right there.
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1012867916600135681
stealth Jeff
“Sessions has Rosenstein leading an effort to roll up leakers that run across the breadth of:
1) the US Congress, in both the House & Senate
2) the DOJ/FBI
3) the Intel agencies
4) the State Dept.
He ain’t giving these leakers the good stuff until the indictments are ready.”
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1012832010992173057 It is not a video...just a twitter post.
When I first posted the link, I did so in knee-jerk fashion. The same kinds of article(s) came out the first time Q hinted that tarmac videos of Hillary were about to be released. The MSM set phasers to “spin” and suddenly there was “concern” about the possibility of fake videos. I wonder now if Q hinted that way to stampede the Deep State into revealing it’s plan for countering damaging videos about Hillary.
But, thanks to Defiant, I dismissed too readily the mention of the Pentagon. I think the timing and the mention of the Pentagon moves this little story from ordinary into “?”
So now that Q knows how the MSM will spin Hillary videos, maybe it’s just as well form them to educate the public about video technology in a manner similar to how Q has been teaching us to research to find the truth. While we normies are suitable red-pill students for all things political/social history, many of us would not devote the time and training needed to hone skills needed for digital forensics. For a digital/video savvy cohort to red-pill, the nation would be better served turning to college students who are studying digital videography to begin with.
Note the article, which I will link below, says “The goal is to provide the general public a set of tools that we can use to verify images, video and audio, This has a Q feel to it - make the citizenry the experts because the MSM will surely lie to them with fake expertise.
And it helps if the Pentagon itself is incentivizing the development of fake video detection among the public- it casts doubt on the idea they’d release fake videos while running a contest for college students to detect fakery.
I may be wrong here, but I find the idea of the Pentagon focusing on educating the public to detect fake digital media conspicuous, but thanks to Defiant, I now mean that in a good way. :)
Title: “Are your eyes lying to you? Experts, Pentagon hunt for tools to detect hoax videos”
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article213987384.html
WOW! Attack^ (recent Q post)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.