This Could Be A Major Reason Democrats Won’t Press Charges Against The Awan

Daily Caller ^ | 062718 | Nick Givas

[qaz123]

Editor-in-Chief of The Daily Caller News Foundation, Chris Bedford, shed light on a hacking scandal Wednesday surrounding Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke and her possible ties to Pakistan.

“These allegations bring a new kind of allegation to the whole Awan case. So far we’ve really been dealing with hacking and unauthorized access to networks, possibly ferreting information back to Pakistan,” Bedford said on Fox Business’ “Mornings With Maria.” “Now we actually have people who are implicating a chief of staff for a congresswoman, Yvette Clarke. Chief of staff Shelley Davis.”

[qaz123]

If they were hacking government systems, stealing government property, defrauding the government, why do charges need to be pressed by this Congresswoman?

Wouldn't the DOJ have jurisdiction over this? Conduct an investigation and bring it to a Grand Jury and prosecute? It would seem that, by allowing all the responsibility for the matter to rest on this corrupt member of Congress, she's able to cover up her own, and many others, crimes.

[dirtboy]

Someone tell Sessions she was smoking a joint while hacking. That will get Magoo going.

[Signalman]

It doesn’t matter whether or not “the Dems” press charges. It’s whether the USDOJ presses charges. And since Rosenstein is the de facto head of the DOJ, it’s doubtful if they will.

[Ann Archy]

The entire Awan story is one of the BIGGEST SCANDALS in the history of this country!

[qaz123]

Exaclty. Yet another “F*ck You” to all of us.

These guys steal money, equipment, information, and who knows what else and they’re gonna walk, probably. All to protect some incompetent, corrupt, criminals in Congress.

Truly mind boggling how little they care about the people of this country.

[qaz123]

Exaclty. Yet another “F*ck You” to all of us.

These guys steal money, equipment, information, and who knows what else and they’re gonna walk, probably. All to protect some incompetent, corrupt, criminals in Congress.

Truly mind boggling how little they care about the people of this country.

[qaz123]

And is being blatantly squashed before our eyes.

[Pajamajan]

BUMP

[Ann Archy]

IMPEACH JEFF SESSIONS!!!!

[ncfool]

This is typical of the Gov waste going on with no accountability. It Sucks as its every Gov office in the country and not just Congress / Senate.

[JohnG45]

Truly mind boggling how little they care about the people of this country.

That bears repeating:

Truly mind boggling how little they care about the people of this country.

[alloysteel]

CYA. The Democrat House members do not WANT the DOJ snooping around in this, as it may very well lead to revealing a much deeper layer of muck in the Swamp than anyone now readily accepts. This could go to truly treasonous activities, revealing the internal workings of transfer of intelligence to foreign entities, and leaking of highly sensitive matters to persons who have no right to know.

And who knows, it may just lead right back to the Obama Regime itself.

These matters must be treated - delicately.

[b4its2late]

LOL. Something needs to be done about him getting into action. Is he asleep under a tree somewhere?

[dead]

Someone tell Sessions she was smoking a joint while hacking. That will get Magoo going.

Especially if she has a nice car.

[Liz]

ORGANIZED CRIME ON CAPITOL HILL.... DEMOCRATS take the "Oath of Omerta."

NY Democrat---Cong Yvette Clarke and friend.

Clarke She describes herself as a "Queen of the Caribbean;"
She belongs to the Congressional Caribbean Caucus.
Clarke made friends quickly, what with her knowledge of offshore banking havens in the Caribbean.

HOW THE IT SCAM WAS RIGGED FOR PROFIT----Democrat NY Cong Yvette Clarke's office approved a $120,000 "write-off" of tax-paid tech Equipment Linked To the Awan clan (made the tax dollars and the equipment disappear).The missing govt-issue tax-paid devices included many iPhones and iPads. At $800 each, Cong Yvette Clarke's $120,000 write-off would force taxpayers to pay for 150 electronic items for her staff of 16......that's about 10 iPhones and iPads each.

Democrat Cong Yvette Clarke's tax-paid payroll records indicate she has 16 employees......why did Cong Clarke need so many electronics for that small staff? She was also oblivious to the fact that all that expensive govt-paid equipment she ordered was delivered to Imran's house.

According to ace reporting by the Daily Caller, Cong Clarke's office casually signed off on what appears to be a theft ring operating inside the Democrat Congressional Caucus then-headed by Cong Becerra.The facts suggest the Awan gang was running the oldest of scams......selling computer gear out the back door after first reporting it stolen to authorities. (hat tip The Daily Caller).

NOTE: Democrat Clarke is only one employer audited, so far. Patterns of theft in other Democrat offices have yet to be investigated.

===============================

EXCERPT....then-Democrat Cong Becerra never publicly acknowledged nor demanded consequences for the cyber breach on his House Democratic Caucus server (similar in nature to the DNC)......and eighteen months later, no one has been charged....not surprising since the elected Democrats don’t appear to be asking for it......

This is a huge red flag. This is organized crime on Capitol Hill.

Democrats have apparently taken the "Oath of Omerta."

[Liz]

The Awans had access to ALL the Democrats Congressional data including Democrats' constituent emails. Imran Awan is the walking example of an insider threat, a criminal actor who had access to everything. The Pakis were using Xavier Becerra’s House Democratic Caucus as their central service warehouse. The data was completely out of the members’ possession. Does it mean it was sold to the Russians?

Then-Cong Becerra headed the House Congressional Democrat Caucus. Becerra gave the Paki spies free reign over all US intel.

<><> Imran’s wife Hina Alvi was the only IT officially authorized to use Xavier Becerra's House Democratic Caucus computer equipment. She is on record as logging on about 300 times.

The the rest of the Awan crew were accessing intel on Becerra's computer thousands of times using Becerra's passwords and codes. This clearly shows the Pakis were operating as a cohesive, collusive undercover unit.

Becerra was looking the other way (snort).

Becerra---now Cali's top lawman----refuses to answer questions about this.

<><>The Awan family was logging in to Xavier Becerra’s House Democratic Caucus server with 17 different accounts belonging to Congressional offices whose data should have had no connection to the caucus, according to the House investigative report. The patterns were consistent with data being funneled onto Becerra’s server from other members of Congress, but the members said Becerra never alerted them of any aberrations. (Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...

[Liz]

IMRAN AWAN, US GOVT EMPLOYEE, WORKED HOUSE INTEL IN PAKISTAN---

Cong Louis Gohmert (Repub-Texas), a former judge, was shocked to learn that Imran Awan conducted the Congress of
the United States' IT work in Pakistan, for months at a time, without supervision.

GOHMERT: “I did not realize that we (taxpayers) paid someone the maximum that any House employee could get paid........ and for months at a time, he was handling information technology for the House of Representatives from Pakistan. This is just mind-boggling. I had no idea anybody would even think about trying to do something like that,” Gohmert added.

Imran is a US govt employee. He cashes US govt paychecks. He's handling Congressional data----sensitive top secret data---he's in an active terrorist country for months at a time handling US intel without supervision. Yet his mentor and employer Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz did nothing. Congressional Democrats who employed Imran said nothing.

Taxpayers must demand answers:

<><> How did Awan get a sensitive job in the US Congress?

<><> Was he given preference over American job-seekers?

<><> Claiming to be a naturalized American citizen, did he falsify his credentials?

<><> did Democrat Debbie Wassermann Schultz sign-off on Imran's trips to Pakistan?

<><> did Democrat Schultz inform others that Imran conducted IT work for the House in Pakistan?

<><> did Democrats inform constituents their emails were being accessed in a terrorist-sponsored country?

<><> why did Debbie Wasserman Schultz keep Imran on as her "advisor" after his shady deals were exposed?

TAXPAYERS DEMAND TO KNOW WHY WASSERMAN SCHULTZ AND DEMOCRATS ALLOWED A US GOVT EMPLOYEE TO HANDLE US INTEL AND THEIR AMERICAN CONSTITUENTS' PERSONAL EMAILS IN A TERRORIST-SPONSORD COUNTRY

Wassermann Schultz installed Imran and his clan of two brothers, two wives, one a Russian national, one known friend, and a host of ghost employees in the US Congress. Taxpayers demand to know the extent of Schultz's assistance to (A) the three House members of the House intelligence panel, and, (B) the five House members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, among the dozens of elected Democrats employing the Pakistani IT's.

CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044

Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414

[Liz]

Yvette Clarke's CYA maneuvers do not exculpate her from wrongdoing....she's trying to lay the blame on a chief of staff no longer in her employ.......that the ex-staffer was complicit with Awan in the fraudulent electronic billing scam.

AND GET THIS Clarke’s office felt the amount was so small that it was a better course of action to “write it off” than prosecute.

(A) Cong Clarke’s current c/o/s says Clarke's previous c/o/s is the one complicit with Awan in the fraudulent electronic billing scam.
(B) Clarke’s office felt the amount was so small that it was better to “write it off” than prosecute.

Balderdash and poppycock. Identity of the staff member is immaterial.

(A) By the rules of the House, Clarke herself HAD to sign off on any transaction. There's no escaping Clarke's role in this.....
AND OTHER MISAPPROPRIATIONS OF TAX DOLLAR. There's a zillion ways these conniving pols can steal from us.

(B) Clarke's good at covering her Caribbean ***.....she felt the amount was so small that it was better to “write it
off” than prosecute? Do tell. Clarke's rather cavalier with our tax dollars, isnt she?

Absolutely NONE of this gets Clarke off the hook for her enabling the Paki spy games.

REALITY CHECK---Clarke must be compelled to explain why govt-issue equipment she bought for her office with our tax
dollars was delivered to her IT's home.....and was never seen again.

BIG CLUE: the tech equipment supplier to Congress has the paper trail.

[Liz]

A Strange Tale: the Congressional Federal Credit Union and Democrats' IT spies
SOME RESEARCH PROVIDED BY ANDREW McCARTHY (sarcasm provided by poster):

Bank fraud was the stated charge on which Debbie Wassermann Schultz's IT aide, Imran Awan, was arrested at Dulles Airport, as he was fleeing the United States for Pakistan, via Qatar.......the same route taken by his wife, Hina Alvi, in March, when she suddenly fled, with $12,400 in cash (NOTE: it is against the law to take more than $10,000 out of the US without declaring it.).

By the time of Imran's arrest, the proceeds of his fraudulent $165,000 "loan" from the Congressional Federal Credit Union had been wired to Pakistan.... part of a $283,000 transfer that Awan managed to wire from Capitol Hill.

The conniving Imran pulled it off by pretending to be his wife in a phone call to Capitol Hill's true believers---the Congressional Federal Credit Union. Told that his proffered reason for the transfer (“funeral arrangements”) wouldn’t fly, “Mrs.” Awan promptly regrouped: Now “she” was “buying property.”

Asking no more questions, the compliant Congressional Federal Credit Union wired the money......to Pakistan. One assumes the trusting Congressional Federal Credit Union had every expectation of getting repaid (cue laugh machine here).

==============================================

CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044

Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414

FBI TIPS PAGE--YOU MAY REMAIN ANONYMOUS ---https://tips.fbi.gov

TALKING POINTS---The credit union employee (or bank officer) that approved the Imran loan and wire-transfer needs looking into. They had to know that was a farce. and one assumes Cong Debbie had to sign off on any financial transactions of her employee.

Congressional Federal Credit Union
PO Box 23267
Washington, DC 20026-3267

Local 703.934.8300
Toll Free: 800.491.2328
From Capitol Hill 6.3100
Email Email@CongressionalFCU.org

WEB SITE
https://www.congressionalfcu.org/about/about-us/about-congressional-federal

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

I myself think none, zero of this true; that an indictment would ultimately target somebody’s chief of staff. That ain’t no big deal, she’d be exactly the kind of person the DNC or the Dems would throw under the bus. The theft of computer gear or cel phones is likewise a nothingburger, the investigation would cost 20x the cost of the stolen gear. (That of course would be no barrier)

This investigation is never going to happen because the national security implications and the implications for the Democrat party itself are simply too vast and profound; any potential investigators would be the next Strzoks and McCabes. They would simply fake any such investigation and deliberately find nothing. They would never investigate with any rigor. Nobody knows (and probably never will) just how far and deep this goes, but if 40 or so DNC congresspeople were indicted for espionage and failure to report blackmail, which is what this is really about, the Democrat party would simply implode. This is only one small notch below the whole anti-Trump surveillance-and-smear effort and is probably one of the the top ten most egregious espionage cases in US history.