1 posted on
06/23/2018 7:30:21 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Good. Let them apply it to the Kenyans birth certificate.
2 posted on
06/23/2018 7:32:46 AM PDT by
broken_clock
(Go Trump!)
To: BenLurkin
But can it tell the difference between a picture of an illegal immigrant child separated from a parent for a two minute search and one shipped off for foster care?
3 posted on
06/23/2018 7:35:09 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(I can't tell if we live in an Erostocracy (rule by sex) or an Eristocracy (rule by strife and chaos))
To: BenLurkin
Comming soon, Photoshop plugins to correct this issue.
Gimp may already have a tool kit cover your tracks?
5 posted on
06/23/2018 7:37:09 AM PDT by
DUMBGRUNT
(This Space for Rent)
To: BenLurkin
>>Whenever someone alters an image, unless they are pixel perfect in their work, they always leave behind indicators that the photo is modified.
Most digital photos these days are manipulated, heavy use of filters, cropping, some cut and paste or shadowing. Supposedly they were going to stop giving Pulitzers to digital photographers.
None of this addresses staged photos (think of the shot of 20 photographers getting a closeup of the Palestinian woman crying at the “wall” while her son giggles at all of the attention the press is giving.
None of this addresses misattributed photos (the 2014 photo of child abuse under President Obama or the protester’s photo of is kid at a rally behind “bars”).
6 posted on
06/23/2018 7:37:29 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it)
To: BenLurkin
This will simply provide the ability to train their increasingly sophisticated manipulation tools against the manipulation detection algorithm until it can’t tell the difference.
To: BenLurkin
For a while. The news media types will just create software that creates fake photos that avoid detection.
9 posted on
06/23/2018 7:42:29 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Liberalism is the denial of human nature.)
To: BenLurkin
Wow. I wonder if it could figure out if this image is photoshopped.
10 posted on
06/23/2018 7:43:04 AM PDT by
MV=PY
(The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
To: BenLurkin
Adobe only exists because of photo and document doctoring, no?
why don’t they just shut themselves down?
11 posted on
06/23/2018 7:43:28 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: BenLurkin
Will they have a statement regarding the *cough* Birth Certificate *cough*?
14 posted on
06/23/2018 7:47:01 AM PDT by
sevlex
To: BenLurkin
Kind of useless if you ask me. Most intelligent people can use their common sense and other techniques to determine if a photo is Photoshopped or not. Only idiots and the commie lib snowflakes were fooled by this week’s Time ragzine cover.
To: BenLurkin
lets see what it thinks about this:
That hand looks awful funny
17 posted on
06/23/2018 7:51:17 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
To: BenLurkin
Whatever happened to Travelin’ Guy?
19 posted on
06/23/2018 7:55:41 AM PDT by
IronJack
(A)
To: BenLurkin
I Miss Her
Flat Fatima, Where ARE You?
20 posted on
06/23/2018 8:01:39 AM PDT by
left that other site
(For America to have CONFIDENCE in our future, we must have PRIDE in our HISTORY... DJT)
To: BenLurkin
Adobe created a Frankenstein monster and now wants to put it back in the bottle. (mixed metaphors intended)
To: BenLurkin
I’ll be sad if Huge Cat is fake.
28 posted on
06/23/2018 1:06:25 PM PDT by
Yaelle
To: BenLurkin
OMG! They just found out this one WAS REAL!!
29 posted on
06/23/2018 1:09:39 PM PDT by
Yaelle
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
