I'm literate enough to read this:
The researchers are currently compiling a larger dataset to increase the geographical/time coverage of their model and improve its accuracy. « Given the rapid increase in the number of ancient skeletons with published DNA, we believe that our technique will be useful to develop alternative hypotheses,» Dr Esposito will say
You can pick cherries, iow. Also in the excerpt:
TPS has already shown that its results are very similar to those obtained with traditional radiocarbon dating. We found that the average difference between our age predictions on samples that existed up to 45,000 years ago, and those given by radiocarbon dating, was 800 years [800/45000 is under 2%]... Radiocarbon technology requires certain levels of radiocarbon on the skeleton, and this is not always available.