Posted on 06/15/2018 8:43:24 PM PDT by ransomnote
There is a lot of discussion on ES and the goggle emails...
I thought maybe some of you would be interested in this article:
IG Report: FBI Agent Peter Strzok Sent Weiner Sealed Indictment To His Personal Email
One of the interesting aspects of the IG report is the documented use of personal email by participants within the FBI small group Mid-Year-Exam (MYE) team. [pg 424]
One of those documented examples involves FBI Agent Peter Strzok downloading the content of the sealed Anthony Weiner Indictment, October 29, 2016, to his personal email address. Unauthorized extraction of a sealed SDNY indictment, and transmission to a non-secure system, is a felony.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/16/ig-report-fbi-agent-peter-strzok-sent-weiner-sealed-indictment-to-his-personal-email/
***********************************************
So since it’s ‘out there’ as they say, have fun bringing up all the government emails we can!!!
Thank you for the correction.
That being the case, I'm a little more open to txhurl's theory, although I don't know why Seth would have visited there. I think being involved in a sting that would have required him to go there is a little too far out for me.
Ears keep growing as we age.
I think your theory is solid and that it is certainly possible that old missiles can be use for launch vehicles, but nothing else fits the context that q dropped that this was not planned and was not the good guys.
You also have the Trump tweet from June 11th Notice the two misspelled words; Missile and Stopped, there are no coincidences....
(2) MISSILE FIRES W/ A STRATEGIC PURPOSE
(2) EXTINGUISHED.
THIS IS NOT A GAME.
THIS IS WAR.
MISSILE.
MISSLE.
FOX THREE.
SPLASH.
This is not a game.
Certain events were not suppose to take place.
Q
1475
Jun 12 2018 15:55:46 (EST)
FOX M1 STOLEN TAKEDOWN
Donald J. Trump
Verified account
@realDonaldTrump
Jun 11
The fact that I am having a meeting is a major loss for the U.S., say the haters & losers. We have our hostages, testing, research and all missle launches have stoped, and these pundits, who have called me wrong from the beginning, have nothing else they can say! We will be fine!
Q
Enlarge that picture and count all the fingers that is holding the cigarette. Also that thing coming out from Barry looks mighty strange to be a hand.
Yeah but Schmidt knows all about setting up the kind of database that contains everything on every individual like what’s never been seen before, to paraphrase Maxi.
me too and I throw in a few choice cuss words in case they are listening.
Q may be a person, it may be a channel, it may be a team, it may be a UNIT.
Thanks ransomnote.
Steal away!
You need good ingredients when you prepare new threads in your Easy Bake Oven!
We asked members of the Midyear team why they did not seek to obtain the personal devices that Clinton's senior aides used during their tenure at the State Department, given that these devices were both (1) potential sources of Clinton's work-related or classified emails; and (2) unauthorized locations where classified emails were potentially being stored. In addition, we inquired about the decision not to obtain Huma Abedin's personal devices given (1) that she stated during her interview that she had given them to her attorneys for production of her work- related emails to the State Department; and (2) the decision to seek a search warrant in October 2016 in order to search the Weiner laptop. Witnesses also told us they believed there was a flaw in the culling process that resulted in the exclusion of most of Abedin's clintonemail.com emails from the State Department production.We found that the FBI team and the prosecutors decided together to generally limit the devices they sought to those that either belonged to Clinton or were used to back-up or cull Clinton's emails. The team provided, among others, the following reasons for placing this limitation on the scope of the investigation: (1) the culture of mishandling classified information at the State Department which made the quantity of potential sources of evidence particularly vast; (2) the belief that Clinton's own devices and the laptops used to cull her emails were the most likely places to find the complete collection of her emails from her tenure as Secretary of State; and (3) the belief that the State Department was the better entity to conduct a "spill investigation." With respect to the first rationale, we note that it fails to acknowledge that the team was not required to take an all-or-nothing approach. For example, a middle ground existed where those devices belonging to Clinton's three top aides--which the team determined accounted for approximately 68 percent of Clinton's email exchanges--would have been reviewed, but devices belonging to other State Department employees would not.
ROTFL. We can't look there, there might be too much criminal activity going on! Better let the state Department swear to following the law.
Page 153 of the recent OIG/DOJ Report.
That’s a REAL BAD pic of Lisa Page..............
Different things ... (Seth Rich not tied to Schmidt / Google rogue comms network in NK + other things ie gmail)
The photo doesn't show the letter(s) past "Gues". It could say "Guest".
I concur from that perspective - but I think its only useful for that purpose - NEWS unlocks the MAP. People having knowledge of the who/what/when/why/how/where etc. behind the news from the map can discuss details of such without having to prove Q - which is pointless. Q directs to open source and we have more than we know. We dont have to prove Q, just direct others to the same open source. See how the same happens with trolls on these threads - they challenge Q but they cant challenge facts that Q leads folks to discover and answer the questions. IMO ;)
___________________________________________________
I share your opinion but you said it so much better than I have in prior posts. Q is “open source”. That’s what bores me about trolls who attack Q as a kid in a basement etc. (myeah....riggggght). The attacks on Q miss the point that, in the final analysis, the truth does not depend on Q’s identity at all. With the help of Q and the Anons, We The People are laying hands on evidence already out there. Once we were able to do our own research and build our own knowledge, the black hats lost control of the narrative. There’s nothing the MSM can say to refute our knowledge base.
In the past, I have been too quick to dismiss Q proofs for this reason. But Q has pointed to their importance and where Q goes, I go.
Photogenic she's not.
They think they are attacking the information by attacking the "source", Q.
And that's all they got. If we take that away from them, they got nothing.
Simple as that.
I LOVE PROOFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.