Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

Regarding #1474 & #1475: I believe 1474 is referring to a counter-action or mission related one way or another to the missile launch (the launch could have been part of this action...or, less likely I think, the cause of the action). “Fox” is the giveaway here...and “Stolen” is a bit chilling in this context. 1475 is also in reference to the counter-mission.

Another thing about this launch, I am very familiar with the area of the photo and the launch, I was born and lived for decades on Puget Sound and married a woman whose father was stationed at NAS Whidbey. This is not the place to launch a missile from, if you wish it be unobserved. Even at 3:56 AM. The military would only launch from here if it were absolutely necessary to do it right NOW. These are very narrow, constricted and protected waters — it would be like firing a missile from upper Chesapeake Bay. It is an area with heavy shipping, ferry, pleasure boat and fishing boat traffic. Fishing boats would definitely be active at the crack of dawn. If you had any time flexibility whatsoever, you’d certainly move out into the Strait of Juan de Fuca, a much wider body of water, or better yet out into the Pacific. A submarine near the surface in this location would have traffic around it, even at 4 in the morning...in the middle of June nonetheless, when there is some light available this far north. (This is why I think this must be a friendly launch, and also one done in some hurry. They were willing to take the risk, and indeed they were observed (which they had to be, in this location).


166 posted on 06/13/2018 9:05:04 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


Trying to make amends with Trump?

STUNNING: Trudeau Follows Trump's Lead, Votes To Denounce Iran Regime

https://www.dailywire.com/news/31778/stunning-trudeau-follows-trumps-lead-votes-hank-berrien?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=KenBlackwell

167 posted on 06/13/2018 9:08:55 AM PDT by TruthWillWin ([MSM])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

And Q warned us: the ‘weather’ in FF weather event (WW) was that weather cam that caught it.


169 posted on 06/13/2018 9:13:44 AM PDT by txhurl (World War Q..... next stop: Arizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

Very hard to get any info on this Scott and none of the networks are talking.Very strange.


198 posted on 06/13/2018 9:48:30 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

I agree with you on your assessment. I was wondering about this as well. If it was a DS launch they wouldn’t do it there, they would want to hide it. And if it was a DS launch, what sub / ship would they use? Could / Would they sneak a rouge sub into the area? If it was an local known boat it would all be very easy to reconstruct and determine the bad guys.

Q post 1494 says this in part:
(2) MISSILE FIRES W/ A STRATEGIC PURPOSE
(2) EXTINGUISHED.

I believe the 2 referred to are the Hawaii and Japan Missiles. This Whidbey launch would make a 3rd launch and you would think Q would include it and his drop would say
(3) MISSILE FIRES W/ A STRATEGIC PURPOSE
(3) EXTINGUISHED.

Thus I think this further indicates this was a Friendly Launch - Hmmm... wonder about the target. Any ideas or published events that could be explained by this launch and the ensuing destruction?


1,146 posted on 06/14/2018 10:22:25 AM PDT by kneedragger111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson