You seem to have ignored my previous post to you, #393. That's unfortunate, because you keep accusing me of saying something I didn't say.
And, that's unfortunate because I do say enough controversial here, on my own, to already have irritated some people, though that is not my intention.
But it's not OK to ascribe everything that anyone says that you perceive as "anti Q" to me.
So, I will try again and make it crystal clear for you.
The following post is by SkyPilot, not me. I responded to it saying, that I was not aware of anything happening today, but the OIG report (due Thursday) should be fun. Here is SKYPILOT's original post: #322.
It is 3:00 pm EST. What was the “earth shattering” release that we were told would happen today (6\11)? Spaceshot says it was so big he was going to take today off from work and watch the news. I haven’t seen anything on Drudge (other than Singapore summit, which is not “earth shattering.”)
Some one please help me out here.
322 posted on 6/11/2018, 12:00:43 PM by SkyPilot
Separate question: How do you authenticate Q postings?
Hopefully you can understand that a simple blot of text like:
When did we mention/emphasize the 11th?
Those with an agenda to discredit are pushing false information.
They (you) will fail.
Learn.
Use logic.
Q
..isn't self verifying. Anyone can sign something Q.
This is one reason I always use the term "Q and his interpreters". Because Q speaks mostly with his famous "Socratic questions" method, and occasional jpegs. So to get what it means lots of interpretation is needed. (I have noticed he's slightly less enigmatic than he used to be.
And it's also assuming you feel you can somehow authenticate him as the "True Q", an anonymous poster who has moved from chat board to chat board, all of which are primarily designed to facilitate anonymous chat.
And, as with anything humans interpret, interpretations are different.
I don't think that SkyPilot told us where he heard that, or the intepretation of that. But I take him at his word, and the Q quote you include indicates it was a widespread belief, so widespread that Q apparently felt the need to publicly respond to it.
But even our own resident Guru of Q, Bagster, seems to acknowledge that there was such a prediction. In post #454 he says (AND I QUOTE:)
p.p.p.s. Skypilot. I was always under the impression that 6-11 (the latest original IG release date) was what Q was pointing at as BOOM-worthy. That date has been changed. The only other thing of significance I've seen anybody saying might happen today was in regards to Assange.454 posted on 6/11/2018, 2:54:56 PM by bagster
So, apparently there was some expectation of something to do by a number of Q followers. Not by me, I didn't know about it. But by SkyPilot and Bagster, at least, but probably others. Including the person/poster that Q is dressing down in the unauthenticated message you included.
Maybe it was all a big misunderstanding, based on a false Q postings. Or maybe, as Bagster suggests that referred to the OIG report (although why Q would be telling us about the OIG report when the OIG does so himself is a mystery).
Feel free to respond to my actual postings anytime. I do have a lot of sincere questions.
But even our own resident Guru of Q, Bagster, seems to acknowledge that there was such a prediction. In post #454 he says (AND I QUOTE:) Now I'm the "resident guru of Q?" I detect a bit of attitude, Jack. You do know I took the name Lesser Oracle because it was given to me by another anti-Q troll in the same manner you just called me the Guru of Q. Or maybe you didn't know that.
Also, me saying Q was "pointing at" something is not the same as Q "predicting" something. Like you say, just about all dates and predictions are interpretations based on "pointings." Like I said, the 11th was interpreted as significant because of the OIG report being released. Then after that changed, like the anon says, some gave it new significance because of Assange.
People like you then grab onto those dates and when nothing earth shattering happens, use it to debunk Q, as if HE said something specific would happen on a specific date.
I'm glad you have reverted to Q debunker rather than pretending to contribute. That game was pretty transparent, given your history, I have to say. And those obnoxious html tables of yours, goot lawd. Have we seen the last of them at least?
I wonder if I should name myself the "Resident Guru of Q" or not. Hmmmm…
Bagster
