Posted on 06/11/2018 12:11:22 AM PDT by ransomnote
Bagster wrote on the last thread:
“Every single picture posted is ORIGINAL.
Pulled/Wiped or Taken.
Think about what that means.”
It means all Q pic posts are either pulled from surveillance cameras (i.e. London traffic cams/Epstein security cams) retrieved from wiped sources, or taken directly with cameras by people.
I think, at the very least, it means that Q is not a larp or a squad of 8chan nerds who wouldnt have access to the pics like NSA humint would. Proof of Q?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Does this include early pictures from the Asia trip from the Airplane? I thought those were proofs of Qs proximity to POTUS?
I’m bringing this also over from the previous thread:
#FLY[RR]FLY#
Failure per WH instruction / agreement.
DECLAS_Public[3]
EO dated_official
IG redactions [heavy+][remove]
Hussein [WH [call] [tarmac] BC/LL] #RR#...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
My first reading had me thinking that it was RRs disobedience to DJT....
Am wondering now what would it mean if Failure per WH instruction/agreement could refer to Husseins previous instructions? That RR has been trying to follow those, but is losing heart in doing them and ready to disobey THAT WH in favor of current WH? Or could that be an admonition, pursuing your present course is a failure wrt your WH instruction/agreement with previous administration?
Could he still have the opportunity to fly - to somehow survive this ordeal? Could the bottom quote, You have a choice. Do what is right. be RRs final opportunity to make that break with his previous contract with previous WH?
Not married to this idea, just wondering and throwing it out there - Its what we do!
>>Will The Donald fire RR for breaking his deal on releasing info? I’m thinking a strong maybe is indicated.:)
YES!!!!!!!!!!! Exactly what I’m thinking.
Congress threatened impeachment if Trump fired RR, but he would be doing it in SUPPORT of Congress, so how can they object? Well, they can, but only the crazy ones and it won’t lead to support for the whole Congress really doing impeachment.
Wonderful summary, Bagster.
Am giggling at the word order on the German Merkle’s speech balloon!
(Germans noted for inverted word order such as throw the horse over the fence some hay.)
“What Frick The???” is reminiscent and suggestive of that inverted word order.
I’m trying to figure this out. So your position is that Lewis Arthur and all of his claims are legitmate?
Holy crap. I decide to sleep eight hours and go grocery shopping this morning and all HELL breaks loose. I need to get a Qalarm or something. Gotta catch up I got last thread to read and message mail. Holy crap. I have become the White Rabbit, I’m late, I’m late for a very important date.
I’m wondering if BW is protecting Kim, who is always at risk for assassination or coup, especially when he sets foot out of NK.
If Kim is actually going to strike a deal, maybe even for re-unification of Korea, there are those who would prefer him terminated with extreme prejudice.
Q post 1449...
(also includes a picture of that big swimming pool, I think, that sits atop a hotel)
No. 72
Where was Kim tonight?
How was this known?
You are watching a ‘plan’ being set in motion.
Enjoy the show.
Q
Oh and there’s more on Arthur.
Never heard that children were found at site. That point is irrelevant anyway. Never heard about a knife being found. Also, irrelevant. A body was found twenty miles away, as your guy admits. Was it a child's body? Was it along the route that would be the supposed "pipeline?"
A shallow grave isn't a grave unless a body or evidence of a body is found in it. What does that even mean? I already addressed the "two hour" local l.e. investigation the guy himself talked about. Your guy himself admits that it was "more than a homeless camp." What does that MEAN? And why doesn't he say why he thinks that? What is he not talking about? And why is he not talking about it?
He seems very eager to debunk this site and what it looks like. I agree with him that it looks like "more than a homeless camp."
And what of the property owners and their ties?
You and your guy don't address any of these issues, and blatantly so. Why? Explain the toys and furniture found in the hole in the ground. Explain the restraints found on the trees.
Believe what you want.
Thank you for your kind permission.
Was this a child trafficking site? Perhaps it was but the entire thing was overblown by a group and a person with VERY suspicious ties.
You concede that it was "perhaps" a child trafficking site but that it was "overblown." How can that be overblown?"
And as far as suspicious ties go, who cares who brings it to light. I'm more concerned about CEMEX and their suspicious ties. What say you, pouncer?
Bagster
#1449
Q !CbboFOtcZs #103📁
Jun 11 2018 10:26:18 (EST)
MBS_KIM1.png
MBS_KIM2.png
No. 72
Where was Kim tonight?
How was this known?
You are watching a 'plan' being set in motion.
Enjoy the show.
Q
Thanks, No Doll I - you did the post in a much, MUCH better format than I. And you fit it all in one post. :)
A worthy effort, Bags.
I am somewhat of a weekend warrior on these threads because of work ... especially when things are moving fast ... so appreciate your summaries along with those of Swordmaker and others.
I think in this case, Q is pointing to the pics as an additional "proof of Q." I also think he's not only referring to these pics but a lot of his past pics. I also think there is more than one message in that post, as others have theorized.
I'm partial to "proofs of Q" theories.
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.