[bagster]

Claim that children were on site: false
Knife found: false.
Skeleton found at site: false. 20 miles away.
Shallow grave: false.
No investigation: false.
Many other claims: false.

Never heard that children were found at site. That point is irrelevant anyway. Never heard about a knife being found. Also, irrelevant. A body was found twenty miles away, as your guy admits. Was it a child's body? Was it along the route that would be the supposed "pipeline?"

A shallow grave isn't a grave unless a body or evidence of a body is found in it. What does that even mean? I already addressed the "two hour" local l.e. investigation the guy himself talked about. Your guy himself admits that it was "more than a homeless camp." What does that MEAN? And why doesn't he say why he thinks that? What is he not talking about? And why is he not talking about it?

He seems very eager to debunk this site and what it looks like. I agree with him that it looks like "more than a homeless camp."

And what of the property owners and their ties?

You and your guy don't address any of these issues, and blatantly so. Why? Explain the toys and furniture found in the hole in the ground. Explain the restraints found on the trees.

Believe what you want.

Thank you for your kind permission.

Was this a child trafficking site? Perhaps it was but the entire thing was overblown by a group and a person with VERY suspicious ties.

You concede that it was "perhaps" a child trafficking site but that it was "overblown." How can that be overblown?"

And as far as suspicious ties go, who cares who brings it to light. I'm more concerned about CEMEX and their suspicious ties. What say you, pouncer?

Bagster

[Snowybear]

Yeah, the CEMEX ties and everything else, seems like an issue to persue to me.

All I am saying is that Lewis Arthur is a FRAUD. The guy is a LARP that was trying to deligitimize the entire find. That way the MSM can say, “Oh the whole thing was a fraud, Lewis Arthur said this, “ and away they go. Entire thing discredited.

What Sawyer is saying is that yes, there was a legitimate find there and then VOp came in and effed the entire thing up, their only motivation: $$$$$

Nobody is saying Tuscon was fake.

[JockoManning]

You concede that it was "perhaps" a child trafficking site but that it was "overblown." How can that be overblown?" And as far as suspicious ties go, who cares who brings it to light. I'm more concerned about CEMEX and their suspicious ties. What say you, pouncer?

Agreed