Posted on 06/08/2018 11:27:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
SOS!!
I thought I captured both links to a reddit discussion someone posted today.
I had gone to the magnified version and saved it, but did not save the discussion part.... can someone help me get that? I really did search and search, but I just can’t find it. That which I saved does not go back to the discussion.
The magnified link is this:
http://i.magaimg.net/img/3hwo.png
Part Two is this:
I am not familiar with Reddit, and was not able to find Part 1, and I looked and poked over there too.
THANKS FOR YOUR HELP!!
And to whom was she delivering them?
Well said.
Well said.
Dennis Rodman @dennisrodman 1 year ago June 15 I gave this book "Art of the Deal" to Minister Kim Il Guk in Pyongyang, NK. Hoping everyone reads it before the historic Singapore Summit on June 12. We've got the greatest negotiator of all time @realDonaldTrump to show the world how it's done
It might be fake, but it’s out there. Wonder why? Could be our side put it out there to ensure Ryan does not reneg on his promise to not seek re-election. We can do fake news too.
Great New SHARYL ATTKISSON column, I think you’ll appreciate the sarcasm
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/391566-the-fbis-fractured-fairytale?amp
(Excerpt)
Once upon a time, the FBI said some thugs planned to rob a bank in town. Thugs are always looking to rob banks. They try all the time. But at this particular time, the FBI was hyper-focused on potential bank robberies in this particular town.
The best way to prevent the robbery - which is the goal, after all - would be for the FBI to alert all the banks in town. “Be on high alert for suspicious activity,” the FBI could tell the banks. “Report anything suspicious to us. We don’t want you to get robbed.”
Instead, in this fractured fairytale, the FBI followed an oddly less effective, more time-consuming, costlier approach. It focused on just one bank. And, strangely, it picked the bank that was least likely to be robbed because nobody thought it would ever get elected president - excuse me, I mean, because it had almost no cash on hand
bookmark
The US doesn't have to abide by such a law. But Youtube and others operate internationally and will ignore US law in order to censor based on the wishes of the EU.
It would be nice if we had a good legal decision that would make it ILLEGAL in the US to violate constitutional rights despite them being invalid in other countries. In other words, the desires of the EU could NOT violate the first amendment for people in the US.
Had globalist Hitlery won, this wouldn't even be an issue. She and the left agree with the EU regarding censorship.
Yep, understand the organizations flow chart before you act. As in sales, you don’t want to waist your pitch on someone who has zero authority to make decisions. How do you close!
Thank you!Thank you!Thank you!Thank you!Thank you!
I just couldn’t find it! Thank you again!
What about another of my faves, “Zulu.”
https://sfpl.bibliocommons.com/v2/search?query=zulu&searchType=smart
Got a library card?
You’re welcome! :)
Is there a way to make them bigger? I can’t read any of the links.
missed this earlier; yes the buzz is growing ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.