Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Norski
#61: "Of course this is theoretical. Of Course."

Absolutely. God forbid that anyone should do something so dasterdly and against the law, even if it is to protect the lives of his or her loved ones. Myself, I won't even kill rattlesnakes on my property unless they bite someone first.
 

68 posted on 06/05/2018 12:33:43 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Governor Dinwiddie

You may wish to milk the rattlesnake first. I understand that there is a shortage of anti-venom at this time.


69 posted on 06/05/2018 12:43:37 PM PDT by Norski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Rattlesnakes, along with any other venomous snake-copperhead, coral snake, etc-are offed here-too many chickens for them to kill and livestock for them to bite-that gets expensive, and there is the danger of humans and pets being bitten. Rattlesnakes are not wasted by me or mine, either-the rattles and skins sell well to tourists for belts and hat ornaments, and marinated rattlesnake grilled over mesquite or hickory wood is a delicacy I never turn down...


71 posted on 06/05/2018 1:07:01 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson