Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong
Either that or he had the resources the Confederates never had, and in the end that vast resource pool made the difference. Not taking anything away from Grant, just providing cold hard facts that eventually tilted the war to the Army of the Potomac.

Grant served in the west until 1864 and never lost a battle. He out-maneuvered and forced the surrender of two rebel armies. His Vicksburg campaign basically went against every established military maxim on supply and communications channels and wound up cutting the Confederacy in two. Grant's genius was well established before he came east.

42 posted on 06/04/2018 5:35:15 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

Like I said, not taking anything away from General Grant, as he truly was a man for the times, but how much of his success was due to the fact that he also had General William Tecumseh Sherman within his ranks? He was also a man of the times and a true leader, unabashedly brutal, as well as, a military genius.


56 posted on 06/04/2018 6:09:22 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson