++++
Perfect
Posted on 05/21/2018 9:49:19 PM PDT by ransomnote
Yeah, that's okay. I just hope it don't get all out in the street. Well, maybe it's time to clean up that mess too.
ThanQs, Bagster
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The jury is still out on Gowdy. I’m not competent with politic speak but I do know they shower each other with praise all the time. So I’m not concerned with Gowdy’s mueller praise. It has a different meaning in their world.
I know enough to not trust Sessions or Rosenstein and that Wray needs to prove who’s side he is on.
How did and who gave mueller’s stable of political assassins special status?
>>The jury is still out on Gowdy. I’m not competent with politic speak but I do know they shower each other with praise all the time. So I’m not concerned with Gowdy’s mueller praise. It has a different meaning in their world.
I know enough to not trust Sessions or Rosenstein and that Wray needs to prove who’s side he is on.
How did and who gave mueller’s stable of political assassins special status?
***************************************************
Politic speak is what disgusts most Americans. That’s why they loved Direct speak Trump. I don’t know any “jury members”. In my view, Gowdy is a stealth slithering snake who likes to play both sides, which makes him vile.
I read here tonight that Wray answers to Rosenstein, which may explain his seeming lack of action and “tied hands”.
Didn’t Rosenstein give Mueller special status? I thought that was what the Gateway Pundit article said.
Gowdy’s still a wild card, that’s what I’m saying. I think Gowdy’s saying ‘nice doggy’ while he’s looking for a bigger stick.
Here’s another freak out thought. For reasons of his own, and entirely nothing to do with vulnerability, Trump may decide to not run in 2020. Just conjecture on my part.
Trump’s carrying the world on his shoulders.
Very good thread roll by Rex @_VachelLindsay_
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/998757150720589825.html
Bookmark
So the “?” attached to Sessions name is asking if Sessions recommended or approved the Luther Strange candidacy, do you think?
Roger whatshisname, you know, the pal of Trump’s, was pictured on DRUDGE, with a caption about his prepping for indictment, but also adding that the president may not run again.
Given the desperate need to recapture and rebuild our Public Education, academia, we have years of moral and cultural testing ahead. I am concerned to see the greatest president in my lifetime retire, but for the sake of his relief from monumental burdens, who could deny him?
The fight goes on, and the best, most courageous and *cunning* replacement must be supported.
Mulvaney or Pompeo? Pompeo has the smarts and resume, Mulvaney has the smarts and the chops. I’ve thought of Pence as rather a great chaplain, willing to fade into the paint on the wall, but no footprint of warrior intent remotely in sight.
This question mark?
[RR] recuse/fired who has direct oversight of Mueller?
Sessions un-recuse or #3 [until refill]?
Who is Rachel Brand?
This, at post 25 above, is not by Q, but is somebody else's notes, cryptic remarks ...
Luther Strange took Sessions place having been appointed
[Sessions]?
February 8, 2017 52/47
The vote for Sessions was along party lines with the exception of Manchin.
Sessions was counted as present
I have ideas about the meaning and significance of both that section of Q, and the cryptic interpretation of Q.
Q is just asking "who will supervise Mueller if not Rosenstein? Sessions, or #3 at DOJ?
The poster addition of Luther Strange isn't pertinent to interpreting Q's post. I don;t think Brand's name is pertinent either (see post 1732 yesterday), except to clarify past and present #3 at DOJ.
[Sessions]? is just a header before describing the confirmation vote for Sessions, a sort of info fill in to compare with the confirmation vote of Rosenstein.
++++
Perfect
Post #25 is the post I was referencing. I totally missed that it was an Anon post. I can view the distinctions better between Q text and the Anons at 8 Chan, but the text here looks the same and I have to be more careful. I’ve made this error before. Thx.
Democrats are turning their campaign message to the many scandals swirling around the Trump administration, betting that vows to “drain the swamp” will attract voters to their side in November.
The strategy marks an expansion of the Democrats’ midterm agenda, “A Better Deal,” which up until now has focused almost exclusively on kitchen-table economic issues in lieu of the controversies surrounding President Trump and a growing list of people in his orbit.
In extending their message to include an anti-corruption component, the Democrats are painting the Trump administration — and its Republican supporters on Capitol Hill — as an unscrupulous group that’s using power to pad its own pockets while peddling policies to the highest corporate bidder. The Democrats are promising voters they’d be an alternative: The party that would clean the place up. http://thehill.com/homenews/house/388699-dems-expand-2018-message-to-draining-the-swamp Wonder if they will also use MAGA...
Another collection of helperanon posts was presented at post No.1503750. All three collections again at No.1503795.
Pretty much "pizzagate" material, adding that members of Congress are implicated.
If you know the pattern for creating /qresearch/ 8ch.net URLs from post numbers, my remarks here give you all you need to see the material firsthand. FR is against leading people to 8ch.net, so this is all I will post on the subject.
Checking out the blue pill makers, Joe & Mika, this AM. Rank with aversion and diversion, setting Trump up as a crime boss of imaginary proportion and acting against the Constitution. Very smug.
mark
My teevee wasteland is mostly TCM with a smattering of METV and H&I.
I haven’t forgotten that Q mentioned the *”what if”*, that was attached to the word “assassination”. I’m sure you haven’t forgotten, either.
“ We have it all.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.