Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: smoky415

Smoky,
We are here to decode Q drops. Adding one post after another of your own ideas presented in code seems to be derailing the thread.

Those who are comfortable communicating via code work on 8chan with other persons who have similar skills and can understand them. Here your code skills cannot receive the attention they deserve because we are “normies” and Q has told us that we should not invest time on alternative comms. For these reasons, we have to limit our focus on decoding Q drops and not drops by FReepers.

I don’t want to see your skills overlooked and I don’t want to see the Q threads derailed by strings of coded FReeper posts we can’t use. Please post your ideas in language we “normies” can understand on Free Republic and consider contributing your unique coded content skills to the Q effort on 8Chan -they speak “autist” there.


211 posted on 05/20/2018 9:58:57 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote
Here your code skills cannot receive the attention they deserve because we are “normies”

How very diplomatic. Now we see why I'm not in charge of the Q thread.

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

296 posted on 05/20/2018 12:08:52 PM PDT by bagster (The Bagster Alliance is insidous. The B clique is mighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Very diplomatic statement. If I was still working I’d hire you as my PR person, if you were available of course. Lord knows I needed one. :-)


347 posted on 05/20/2018 12:47:54 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote; Jim Robinson; smoky415; Bob Ireland; Swordmaker; MNDude; SkyPilot; Steven W.; ...

Dear Mr. Robinson, ransomnote, and all

Please, Mr. Robinson, I wanted to share with you an example of the proactive work that ransomnote is doing to keep this thread on track. By previous reports there are around 800 subscribers to the Q Ping list who share an interest in this topic and exploration of current news events and history as directed by the entity we know only as “Q”.

We thank you for your presence here the other day delineating your standards of behavior for this thread to continue.

Our new thread saw the strings of posts by a very bright individual, who named himself in one post as having autistic tendencies. I submit that ransomnote has diplomatically sought to persuade this individual to follow the thread and FreeRepublic standards - your standards.

I humbly petition that you will please set aside recent pleas for your intervention attention to this thread, and please let our Free Republic Q Quest continue - within the bounds you have set.

Nevertheless, it is your “living room” and I agree with whatever you decide.

Most sincerely,
TEXOKIE

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ransomnote wrote:

Smoky,
We are here to decode Q drops. Adding one post after another of your own ideas presented in code seems to be derailing the thread.

Those who are comfortable communicating via code work on 8chan with other persons who have similar skills and can understand them. Here your code skills cannot receive the attention they deserve because we are “normies” and Q has told us that we should not invest time on alternative comms. For these reasons, we have to limit our focus on decoding Q drops and not drops by FReepers.

I don’t want to see your skills overlooked and I don’t want to see the Q threads derailed by strings of coded FReeper posts we can’t use. Please post your ideas in language we “normies” can understand on Free Republic and consider contributing your unique coded content skills to the Q effort on 8Chan -they speak “autist” there.


354 posted on 05/20/2018 12:53:43 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Smokey415 = Rush4U

A peak at their posting histories makes it obvious they are one-and-the-same.

Rush4U went dormant since 2008, and then showed up one day after Smokey, engaging in a dialog.

I assume there may be some rule against setting up multiple identities and then self-conversing?

If nothing else, it is quite unseemly.


541 posted on 05/20/2018 2:54:42 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian ((Read "American Betrayal" by Diana West))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson