Posted on 05/19/2018 11:38:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
Until we get defendants in the dock, that is.
That’s just the point. I have. There is no irrefutable evidence. More evidence you are being scammed, in my opinion.
Then you equate not believing in Q with being subject to MSM propoganda. Your either/or argument is pure sophistry.
You are not the best spokesman for Q. Let someone else take over.
Webb is not to be trusted. I’ve said this countless times.
Everyone in my team agrees, BTW, so it’s not just me.
oooouuu, I’ll call Warren’s office and whooop!
>> Obama eligibility - first question should be “what constitutes eligibility?” Actual progress was “Where was he born?”<<
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I agree.
The key question, as you described it, was seldom stated.
I did go to the US Government INS website to see ... and found that the laws have shifted a bit over the years ... but when Zero was born, IF OUTSIDE THE U.S., then HE WAS NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN AT BIRTH.
Thus he could never have become a natural born citizen.
The criteria were:
1) Mother (American) married to a foreign national
2) Mother having reside less than 19 years in the U.S.
3) Mother was 18 at the time.
Hence, IF HE WAS NOT BORN ON U.S. soil, then he was NOT A CITIZEN.
I should add, the law changed a few years later, allowing an 18 year old mother to convey citizenship. But this was not retroactive.
Then how do you find the question an anon is asking on post 1429? I do not see it, frequently when Q posts answering a question he post the question also.
Thanks for trying to explain this, the 8chan boards are confusing.
There seems to be some confusion in communication here. It appears it will work itself out. As for my part, as an original poster on FR, we always referred disruptions to Jim Rob as the owner and moderator of FR; it appears that is not the will of FReeQers... no problem.
Okay, thanks for this feedback.
This explains it the best. I was skipping a few steps in the process. The “Patriotsfight” posts apparently are the Q-only board, though I presume that anybody can copy/paste the posts elsewhere.
I wasn’t fully aware of the mechanics of the posting.
Thanks, Cboldt.
One is either born NBC, or not. There is no "becoming" one after the fact.
I agree, if he was not born on US soil, not a citizen at all, at least not by incident of birth.
I was all over the issue with Cruz, and know the law on this subject very well. I point to Rogers v. Bellei, and a few other (later) cases that prove birth on US soil is MANDATORY to be NBC. McCain is not eligible.
LOL! I’ve never heard about that before.
Nice work! Thank you, patriot!
Why wait till dawn? Any time of day is fine with me.
Someone applied a mirror to the middle image of the London Eye. It’s a Q. Has anyone applied a mirror to any of the other images to see what is revealed?
Butter had the advantage of being in a location at the center of the conspiracy, the “”Birthplace””. There are epicenters like Little Rock or Washington DC where you can do more research organization and activism. If you are in Hales Corners Nebraska your location results in a reduced opportunity for this sort of thing.
You are right. Lately Q has has that laser pointer and has Anons and others chasing red dots all over the Internet to find answers and document them. It sounds like this week the fireworks will really start.
You know, if only caww didn’t have to be such a hardass about this Q project.....
Darned if it isn’t a blue Q!
You could argue that a person born to American parents outside the U.S. is a citizen, but not a natural born citizen.
But in Obama’s case, I’m saying if he was born outside the U.S. he was not even a citizen.
BTW, I could never be President. My parents, both Americans, were missionaries and I was born a U.S. Citizen—but not eligible for President. (At least that’s the way I’ve always understood it.)
No, that wasn't the law at the time, and isn't and never was the structure of the law. Not important for the conclusion, I agree with your conclusion. But you get there with made up law.
The structure has age of mom (if mom is the US citizen component), plus years of US domicile (typical 4 or 5 years) within one year of the birth.
And you still miss my point.
Question, is a dual citizen, or a citizen with mixed citizen parents, a natural born citizen under the law?
I'm not asking or seeking to answer that question, just pointing out that it was never asked. Obama was as much a UK citizen at birth as a US citizen, if we accept the facts stated on the face of the phony BC. Is a dual citizen at birth a NBC under the US constitution?
Q
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.