Thank you for your point, my FRiend.
I see I didn’t do a good writing job. I was citing that article because it portrayed a connection of the D5 Coalition as being under suspicion of being involved in the activities of funding terrorists. I was not seeking to adopt the aim of that article cited.
I know that Gary Sinese who was interviewed by Levin on Sunday, has a Foundation and I suspect he is not abusing the law. It appears he is actually doing good things with being a non profit organization.
I think, however, we can all agree that we need somehow to create more guardrails in the charity area so that such abuses cannot be allowed to perpetuate.
Presidential Round Table Meeting on Sanctuary Cities.
Earlier today I watched the Presidential round table discussion on the Sanctuary Cities. In attendance, among the City, County, and LEO officials were Kevin McCarthy, Kirstjen Nielson the Homeland Secretary, AND JEFF SESSIONS. [Now this is curious: I was doing a duckduckgo search to verify spelling of the Homeland Security Secretary - my first couple of SIRI choices were “Current Homeland Secretary is Janet Napolitano. Hmmmmmm]
I am posting blind here. I am behind in reading posts, as is a common condition on these threads. These impressions may already have been addressed.
I am not trying to give a full report. Just wanted to share some ideas that crossed my mind while watching. This round table was fascinating to watch and while I do not have a link, I’m certain it is available somewhere. At least, it needs to be IMHO!
“17”
Early in the conversation, a participant commented about how much President Trump has accomplished in his short term of office. There was a little exchange that made my ears perk up. He spoke of his 17 months in office - "now 17 years would really be something but it’s 17 months."
My attention on this number in DJT's comments made me trip and fall into a major bunny hole. I've been at it all day, rereading drops.
The reason why that perked my ears up was because for some reason I seem to recall discussions on these threads about the significance of that number - but could not remember why - or even if it had been solved.
It seemed to me that he was giving a marker for the meaning of "17" = May. Which to me squares with the fact that May is seeming to be the culmination of months-long preps and a change in what we will be seeing unfold openly.
In addition to this, I went back to seek to confirm the importance of "17" and found it in drops #1133 and #1137.
#1133 April 11, 2018 21:09:57:
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: e8e4fc 1005902 📁
Apr 11 2018 21:09:57 (EST)
#17
Q
AND
#1137 April 12, 2018 has a single line “17” reference as well:
Anonymous ID: a5617d 1008670 📁
Apr 12 2018 00:34:56 (EST)
>>1007983
>>1008491
Q can you double confirm the #17 was regarding the jerseys, when i asked yesterday for confirmation.
Anons are bringing up every other 17 under the sun, KEK
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: f666d7 1008693 📁
Apr 12 2018 00:36:28 (EST)
>>1008670
Alan.
Welcome aboard.
Plane.
17.
Q
Note that Q does NOT confirm the shirt number as what he is after, but simply repeats “17” on its own line. Indeed, perhaps the shirt number 17 itself was intended to point to May.
However, my search began in October at the beginning of the Q drops, and so as I was reading, I investigated several other possible levels of possible significance of "17," which I plan to post later after I organize the narrative of my search into a more presentable form.
“Watch California”
Another thought which occurred to me as I watched this was Q’s admonition to “watch California” - the energy of this group and the sharing of concerns made me see that yes indeed there is a huge core of patriots in the Golden State, and we MUST NOT GIVE UP ON CALIFORNIA! I, for one will indeed be watching with hopeful eyes the events unfolding in the Great State of California.
“48”
While I suspect that neonrevolt, referred to in my previous comment today has the most solid interpretation of [48] being a reference to “No Name,” it struck me while listening that there may possibly be another to consider:
Sheriff Mims was speaking of the the good relationship his office has been having with ICE and now that relationship is being legally challenged in California. Sheriffs are caught in the middle. ICE will not be able to use the local data bases, and to the things customarily offered to other law enforcement colleagues. Among the things which will be changed by the new laws proposed in California are the the CURTAILING OF ICE’S ABILITY TO HAVE 48 HOUR HOLDS ON PRISONERS THEY WANT TO TALK TO OR ARREST. That 48 hour hold function for the Federal Law enforcement would be stripped from them by the proposed state law. So perhaps that may be an important aspect of the meaning of “48” to ponder.
SESSIONS
Several times when a speaker was appealing to the President for Federal assistance, either financial or legally, Sessions was called upon to “look into it.”
When it was Session’s turn to speak briefly - OH MY GOODNESS!!! It WAS Sessions UNLEASHED! This was the Sessions I recall from the Senate floor - very fiery! I am beginning to see how the Sessions Battle Against MS-13 is really a very small name for a very large operation. GO SESSIONS!
MAGA! KAG! MEGA!
(Make America Great Again! Keep America Great! Make Earth Great Again!)